Concealed-gun law delayed in Missouri
Judge rules statute needs review would cause harm
ST. LOUIS A judge temporarily blocked a law that would make Missouri the 45th state to authorize concealed guns.
Circuit Judge Steven Ohmer ruled Friday that the law needed a further review by the state Supreme Court and would have caused irreparable harm had it taken effect Saturday.
The judge cited comments from debate at Missouri's constitutional convention of 1875 that carrying concealed weapons is "a practice which cannot be too severely condemned" and is connected to "incalculable evil."
An appeal of the order filed by Attorney General Jay Nixon with the state's Eastern District Court of Appeals was denied a short time later. Nixon filed a second appeal with the state Supreme Court, but Bill Thompson, a counsel for the high court, said it would not issue a ruling Friday.
It was unclear when the state Supreme Court would take up the appeal. Ohmer scheduled an Oct. 23 hearing to determine whether to impose a permanent injunction.
Missouri entered the ranks of states allowing concealed guns when the Legislature overrode Gov. Bob Holden's veto last month. The new law also bars identification of concealed weapons permit-holders.
Advocates say the laws have contributed to drops in violent crime by deterring criminals unsure whether a potential victim might be armed. Holden and other critics say more guns in circulation will lead to more violence.
"The conceal and carry law . . . was obviously flawed in many respects," Holden said in a statement Friday. "I believe the court took appropriate action today by preventing this ill-conceived law from taking effect."
Supporters of the law predicted that they eventually will prevail.
"The plaintiffs went judge shopping, and they found what they wanted," said attorney Kevin Jamison, president of the Western Missouri Shooters Alliance. "Their petition is unbelievably frivolous. It shows a complete misunderstanding of the law."
The plaintiffs in the case include public officials, members of the St. Louis Clergy Coalition and the nonprofit Institute for Peace and Justice.
The group cited a section of the Bill of Rights from the 1945 Missouri Constitution that declared the right to bear arms "shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons" and a similar clause in the 1875 version of the Missouri Constitution.
The Missouri attorney general's office argued the constitutional clauses express a reservation, not a prohibition on concealed weapons.
Because the temporary restraining order came so close to the law's effective date, Cole County Sheriff John Hemeyer had said his office would accept applications as planned Saturday. He changed his mind later Friday, saying he didn't want to tie up application fees.
Other sheriffs had not planned on accepting applications until next Tuesday.
Ohmer agreed to hear the case in St. Louis after the city's sheriff was added as a defendant. Most lawsuits against the state are tried in Cole County, where the state capital is located.
- Deseret News Exclusive: Excerpt from Clayton Christensen's 'How Will You Measure Your Life?'
- Women married to NFL Mormons do best to keep things normal at home
- Teen's dad spends school year waving at bus, embarrassing son
- Deseret News Exclusive: Mormon prep basketball phenom Jabari Parker makes the cover of Sports Illustrated
- Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
- Search for Mitt Romney running mate in...
- Does Romney's faith concern a quarter of...
- 10 memorable stories covered by Bruce Lindsay
- Romney's veepstakes: Buzz builds around Rob...
- Top 10 poorest states in America
- NYPD: Person implicated in Etan Patz death
- The 2012 Veepstakes: 20 possible VP picks for...
- President Obama's Bain Capital assault...
55 - New York Times explores how Mitt...
43 - 'A woman who. ...': Mitt Romney's...
33 - Search for Mitt Romney running mate in...
32 - Does Romney's faith concern a quarter...
32 - Orrin Hatch is now the hunted —...
27 - For gay marriage opponents, moments...
21 - Notre Dame, Catholic clinics sue over...
20






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments