From Deseret News archives:

Vanity plate case a slam-dunk

Published: Monday, Oct. 13, 2003 10:57 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
For crying out loud, give Dennis Udink his vanity plate.

Udink, who is Dutch and proud of his heritage, wanted a personalized license plate. A Division of Motor Vehicles program deemed that the Price man's name was vulgar and obscene. Therefore, the DMV would not permit him to receive the vanity license plate.

Frankly, we don't get it. The dictionaries we checked refer to a dink as a shortened version of the word dinghy, which is a small boat or raft. We understand the word is used occasionally as slang, or as a pejorative, but the meaning is unclear and its usage is rare.

And, after all, as Udink protests, it's his name. He had no intent of causing a stir. He just wanted a license plate for his sports utility vehicle with his name on it. It's as simple as that.

Of course, dealing with a bureaucracy is never truly as simple as that, is it? It's not as if he knowingly sought out to place an obscene, vulgar or offensive word below his bumper. He just wanted to place the name that was his father's, his grandfather's and so on, on a Utah license plate. Udink is fairly common name if you live in Price or Ogden, where Udink's ancestors settled originally.

Story continues below
Nope, Udink's request has become a federal case. Well, more correctly, a matter heard by the state Administrative Rules Review Committee, which is considering a rule change that would give the DMV more discretion in situations such as this.

Clearly, the DMV needs a little more latitude to better serve the public. There needs to be a process to deal with vanity plate requests that are questionable. Since personalized license plates are seen by all who share the road with the plate holder, the state has some interest in ensuring the messages on the placards are appropriate.

Yet, it's doubtful that an application from a person named Smith or Jones would be given second's hesitation. Understanding his intent, should Udink's application should be viewed any differently?

The Administrative Rules Review Committee needs give the DMV sufficient latitude to grant requests such as Udink's.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I've been reading the book with by daughters. It's a short book and it...

The ethics commission simply researches complaints. They have no power to...

Well, maybe the Ute program has maturity but the fans...? See post above.

Loyal to Cougarettes, Crimson Line

I thought they were talking about our families loyalty to the call of the...

That's easy. Assuming that the property is well maintained and sound is not...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

This is fan blog. Every fan has right to express. Jerry Sloan is just good...

Excellent points (except the plea for more spending on the bloated education...

The reason they were under .500 was because they played 30 games and 8 of 15...

One small detail: Obama has a brain.

This greatly weakens democracy in Utah. You are creating an unelected body...

Advertisements