From Deseret News archives:

New nominee ploy by Hatch

Published: Friday, Sept. 26, 2003 7:30 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, evoked a chorus of protest from Democrats and liberal groups Thursday when he opened a new front in the ongoing war over conservative judicial nominees.

Without a new hearing or consultation with Democrats, Hatch brought up for committee vote the once-rejected nomination of U.S. District Judge Charles Pickering of Mississippi to be elevated to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. Democrats complained loudly, and used committee rules to delay that vote at least a week.

Last year when Democrats controlled the committee, it rejected Pickering's nomination on a 10-9 party-line vote amid charges that he is racist and too pro-life on abortion to follow the law. Hatch complained bitterly that the accusations are false, and said Pickering had enough votes in the full Senate to win confirmation.

When Republicans regained control of the Senate this year, President Bush renominated Pickering. Hatch vowed to have new hearings on him, and to put him in line for action — more or less — behind other nominations in order that they were received.

But when Hatch put Pickering on the agenda for a vote without a new hearing and ahead of other nominees, Democrats howled.

Story continues below
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the committee's ranking Democrat, complained that the committee until this year had never reconsidered a rejected nominee, and even accused Hatch of racial insensitivity with his timing in attempting it now.

"Given the many concerns about Judge Pickering voiced by African-Americans in Mississippi and all over the country … it was most ill-advised to abruptly list the nomination at the time that the Congressional Black Caucus is involved in its Annual Legislative Conference," Leahy said.

He added that if Hatch and Republicans felt the record about Pickering is wrong, they should have held a new hearing to correct it. He noted that four of the 19 members on the committee have joined it since Pickering's last hearing.

Hatch made no response during the hearing, but has said he feels the record has shown Pickering deserves confirmation. For example, while some liberal groups attack him on civil rights, Hatch noted that Pickering, as a young attorney, testified against the Ku Klux Klan when it was dangerous to do so.

On Thursday, Hatch distributed a letter supporting Pickering from the top five statewide Democratic office holders in Pickering's native Mississippi, including Gov. Ronnie Musgrove, Attorney General Mike Moore and Secretary of State Eric Clark.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

TO AGGIE MAN: BRILLIANT LINEUPS I've been saying for 2 years now that our...

After last week it should be an easy vote for anyone who watches college...

Understanding translation process

What feels wrong about it? The church isn't hiding anything about the...

KSL is No. 1

Maybe there is not enough money in the Salt Lake/Provo/Ogden market to...

(cont'd from above) This "authority" given by one branch to another is...

Hecklers upstage Ariz. sheriff

Actually, if you watch the video, the interrupters were not journalism...

2 citations issued at Y.-U. game

One year I went to byu-san diego game. i got up to cheer and someone throw a...

Ok, besides the fact that the Bush Administration LIED thru their teeth about...

Max Hall: a fixture in rivalry lore

I personally thing Max's statements merit the negative attention he is...

Editorial: East, West and religion

May want to consult your Websters. Morals have nothing to do with...

Advertisements