From Deseret News archives:

Transcript: National Press Club Q&A with President Gordon B. Hinckley

Published: Monday, March 27, 2000 8:16 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Questions from Jack Cushman, The New York Times

President of the National Press Club

National Press Club Newsmakers Luncheon

March 8, 2000

Q. Perhaps the most frequently asked question on all of these cards that I have is what role is politics going to be for the church and its members? Please comment a little bit about political activism among your church members?

Story continues below
A. Well, the church itself as an institution does not involve itself in politics nor does it permit the use of its buildings or facilities for political purposes. Now, we do become involved if there is a moral issue or something that comes on the legislative calendar which directly affects the church. We tell our people who are citizens of this land and other lands that they as individuals have a civic responsibility to exercise the franchise that is theirs so they become very active. But as a church, as I have said, we do not become involved in tax matters or any other kinds of legislation unless there be a moral issue which we think is of great importance or something that may be directed to the church, harmfully as we view it, and then we would become involved. We do very little politicking. We look at Washington and smile. (laughter)

Jack Cushman: We welcome smiles in Washington.

Q. A questioner said the church actively supported Proposition 22, the ballot measure banning same-sex marriage which California voters approved yesterday, and asks does the church take any credit for that result and is this a signal of an activist political posture?

A. I don't think it signals a more active political posture, but we were actively involved there. We were part of a coalition that very actively worked on that matter. We are not anti-gay. We are pro-family. I want to emphasize that. We are very grateful for all who worked so diligently and happy for the outcome of that vote, was about 61-38 (percent), by a very sizable margin that prevailed. We are very grateful because California is a bellwether state, and the fight there was very real. I'd like to add the church put no money into that as an institution. All that we spent was contributed by members of the church as individuals, and they gave of their means and their strength and their energy to win a great victory, I think, in terms of their attitude and position.

Recent comments

A kind man; a good man...
A wise man.
Thank you for sharing this.

Joe | April 7, 2008 at 8:59 a.m.

Wonderful. I have learned a great deal about the LDS church from this...

Derek | Dec. 24, 2007 at 3:19 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Jazz blow big lead, hang on

Only if the players get swagger and confidence back they can make the big...

I agree Kim should also be on this list!!

First let me make it clear that I am a BYU Fan. But Honestly I have to say...

Letters: Vegas should conserve

To judge the Las Vegas water usage by simply watching a TV in the hotel room...

Anybody asking themselves what they can do at this point and getting that...

12 high schools ready for 'The Turf'

When will the State Championship games be played? anyone know?

I'd hate to be the attorney who defends this guy. Let's hope his attorney(s)...

....fire Sloan.

Anyone who thinks that those who are on assistance in regards to food and...

GOP blasts Matheson after vote

1. Health insurance is not the only way to pay for disease treatment. 2. The...

Advertisements
Advertisement