From Deseret News archives:

Transcript: National Press Club Q&A with President Gordon B. Hinckley

Published: Monday, March 27, 2000 8:16 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Questions from Jack Cushman, The New York Times

President of the National Press Club

National Press Club Newsmakers Luncheon

March 8, 2000

Q. Perhaps the most frequently asked question on all of these cards that I have is what role is politics going to be for the church and its members? Please comment a little bit about political activism among your church members?

Story continues below
A. Well, the church itself as an institution does not involve itself in politics nor does it permit the use of its buildings or facilities for political purposes. Now, we do become involved if there is a moral issue or something that comes on the legislative calendar which directly affects the church. We tell our people who are citizens of this land and other lands that they as individuals have a civic responsibility to exercise the franchise that is theirs so they become very active. But as a church, as I have said, we do not become involved in tax matters or any other kinds of legislation unless there be a moral issue which we think is of great importance or something that may be directed to the church, harmfully as we view it, and then we would become involved. We do very little politicking. We look at Washington and smile. (laughter)

Jack Cushman: We welcome smiles in Washington.

Q. A questioner said the church actively supported Proposition 22, the ballot measure banning same-sex marriage which California voters approved yesterday, and asks does the church take any credit for that result and is this a signal of an activist political posture?

A. I don't think it signals a more active political posture, but we were actively involved there. We were part of a coalition that very actively worked on that matter. We are not anti-gay. We are pro-family. I want to emphasize that. We are very grateful for all who worked so diligently and happy for the outcome of that vote, was about 61-38 (percent), by a very sizable margin that prevailed. We are very grateful because California is a bellwether state, and the fight there was very real. I'd like to add the church put no money into that as an institution. All that we spent was contributed by members of the church as individuals, and they gave of their means and their strength and their energy to win a great victory, I think, in terms of their attitude and position.

Recent comments

A kind man; a good man...
A wise man.
Thank you for sharing this.

Joe | April 7, 2008 at 8:59 a.m.

Wonderful. I have learned a great deal about the LDS church from this...

Derek | Dec. 24, 2007 at 3:19 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU has slim shot at BCS

Mike, don't take it so personal. We know you are a Utah homer, but let's get...

I am a Seneca Indian from Western NY and find the meso America theory hard to...

BYU has slim shot at BCS

If the chances are slim to none, why is this even news?? Trust the D.N. to...

Realize this. They were sub .500 when they entered the playoffs (not that it...

As a little history lesson - the Michigan team BYU played in 1984 was a very...

If you think Utah is going to do anything in conference you are sorely...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

I wonder if what Memo brings offensively is worth what he takes away...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

may have a point. A smaller faster line up may have stopped some of the 3s....

Also, don't conservatives see the silliness of trying to compare Palin with...

Utes set to welcome Seattle

My point exactly. I'm sure the power teams such as Seattle looking for their...

Advertisements