From Deseret News archives:

BOUNDARY DECISION IGNORED PARENTS' RIGHTS, COUNSEL SAYS

Published: Saturday, July 2, 1988 12:00 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

The attorney for parents fighting the Salt Lake City Board of Education's controversial high school boundary decision argued in federal court Friday that the board's action exceeded its authority and arbitrarily denied parents the right to make reasonable choices about their children's education.

Attorneys for the school board, on the other hand, countered that the board violated no state or federal law, acted fully within its legislative mandate and came to its decision only after months of careful deliberations.The attorney for the plaintiffs, Parker M. Nielson, asked U.S. District Judge David K. Winder to remand the decision to the school board so the board can come up with a more appropriate plan.

After closing South High School, the board developed an "equity" plan to redistribute students among the remaining three high schools. The plan set boundaries to achieve three equal high schools by using a balance of academic achievement, enrollment numbers, ethnic populations and academic offerings.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs argue that the equity plan is an unconstitutional "partisan" test.

School board attorneys John E.S. Robson and David Payne have filed a motion for dismissal of the lawsuit, saying "the plaintiffs' claims are not well-taken."

After listening to the attorneys for 90 minutes, Winder took the case under advisement. He gave no indication of when he will rule.

Story continues below

Filed March 4 in 3rd District Court, the lawsuit later was moved to federal court and assigned to Chief Judge Bruce Jenkins. He excused himself.

The plaintiffs originally sought an injunction to prevent the school board from implementing its boundary plan. After Friday's hearing, Nielson said the injunction had been put on hold and in its place the plaintiffs are asking the school board to come up with a different plan based on whatever Winder rules.

Only five plaintiffs - Maria Espinal, Donnie James, G. Harvey Hamilton, Joyce Campbell and Terry Hoecherl - are listed in the lawsuit, but the plaintiffs have said all along that it is a class-action suit representing thousands of affected parents and children in the Salt Lake School District. The real force behind the lawsuit is Citizens for Better Schools, a fund-raising group that was formed after the boundary decision.

Nielson said the lawsuit was not "an East High School" lawsuit. He pointed out the plaintiffs live in different parts of the city and then proceeded to list their assigned schools and where they wanted to go.

"Mr. Nielson," the judge said. "if any of these maps (boundary) had been adopted, you'd have dissatisfied people."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU's Lamb, Jorgensen reprimanded

Cut Blocks are legal, period. Ever seen a running back try to take on a D...

Hatch deserves to be censured for the HOLY WAR comment. It would be an even...

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

In 2006 and 2007 when BYU was winning MWC titles yet needed LUCKY to pull out...

@Anonymous 1:34 p.m.: "Go (sic) she ran a business poorly." She ran the...

I guess it's rivalry week, because all the comments I've read today have been...

If I may offer a bit of education to the misinformed... An LDS meeting house...

Springville should be #1 in 4A.

"I about fell out of my chair when I read Anon 9:06's post that "liberals...

"If you live in Utah, you are likely to be surrounded by mormons. " You...

Plenty on line for rivalry game

Hey, to Mr. "Important Statistic," do your homework next time -- if you can...

Advertisements