From Deseret News archives:

Lawsuit against Utah ed bill is grandstanding

Published: Sunday, June 8, 2008 12:06 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The lawsuit against the education funding bill (SB2) surprised us, but it shouldn't have. Serving in the Legislature means accepting the fact that you can please some people some of the time but not all people all of the time.

Litigants are now trying to explain why we should stop dollars from flowing to the classroom. They say they support education funding but they just don't like that we did it in an "omnibus" bill.

We think that's an excuse. Almost half of the 38 litigants are running for election, and their legal brief is written like an extended press release. Some of their arguments are reasonable. Others are simply untrue.

They make their most obvious mistake when they say that good bills were "held hostage" until the end of the session so they could be combined with "bad" bills in an omnibus package. The fact is that all bills dealing with funding are held until the end of session. That is not a violation of our rules. It is exactly what our rules require and what we do every year. That is how we ensure a balanced budget each year. Legislators know that.

SB2 does include language from bills that didn't pass the first time through. Welcome to the legislative process where ideas continue to circulate.

Story continues below
HB200 was one of those bills. When its language was included in SB2, Rep. Karen Morgan tried to amend it out. The House debated it for 30 minutes. She couldn't persuade a majority to vote with her. Sen. Scott McCoy tried to amend the same provisions. He failed, too.

There were several more attempts to amend SB2, but you get the picture. The fact is that every single word in SB2 was subject to discussion and amendment. Welcome to an essential (and potentially frustrating) element of democracy: You need a majority. It seems the political message here is if you lack the votes, take them to court.

Our so-called omnibus bill was 42 pages — hardly the thousand-page congressional monstrosity the litigants try to invoke.

No one likes "omnibus" bills. They have been used in the past, but we use them sparingly. We avoid them for the same reasons enunciated by those who have filed a lawsuit. However, we have much to accomplish in 45 days, and time-saving tools are sometimes necessary. The final days of the previous session was one of those instances.

Recent comments

They can try to justify this crummy piece of legislation by saying it...

Homer | June 9, 2008 at 11:40 p.m.

You may try to argue that all bills had the single subject,...

"Education" not a single subject | June 9, 2008 at 9:44 a.m.

You all are hilarious! I've never seen such a bunch of whiny...

What a laugh! | June 9, 2008 at 8:38 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

How to pay for the war

A war tax is brilliant. When people are assessed a war tax, maybe they will...

All you list are simple oppinion's not valid in the discussion, because there...

It's hilarious to see conservatives so convinced that the underpaid academic...

It is amazing how Mormons today think the people and the world of Joseph...

Cougars going back to Vegas

WHILE PEOPLE ARE INTO THE MAX HALL STATEMENTS, I SAW SOMETHING PERPLEXING....

What does Utah deserve? Utah has not beaten anyone this year. AFA was Utah's...

Private insurance companies are, as you said in the letter, out to make a...

Letters: Crashing the monarchy

once again, you do not elect kings the fact that these people are elected...

Letters: 'Political priestcraft'

@ 7:45, You have misread that Article of Faith when you claim that we are...

"To MormonDem" | 7:45 a.m. said: "Are you aware that it prohibits anyone...

Advertisements