School fears resonated in gay votes

Published: Friday, Nov. 6, 2009 10:01 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

SAN FRANCISCO — Gay marriage opponents pulled off another victory at the ballot box this week by using a tried-and-tested argument: Approve it and children will be taught homosexuality in school.

Voters seemed to be swayed by the message, both in Maine and in last year's gay marriage battle in California. And it has become an important part of the ever-evolving playbook of gay marriage opponents, who have now won 31 consecutive statewide ballot measures against the issue.

In Maine and California, voters were besieged with ad images of what would supposedly happen if same-sex marriage were legal: students going on a field trip to a lesbian wedding, elementary school kids reading books featuring gay couples, kindergartners learning about homosexuality from their teachers — all without any say from parents.

Critics assailed the messages as blatantly misleading fear-mongering.

"It's drawing on the fears of the unknown," said Sandy Maisel, director of the Goldfarb Center for Public Affairs and Civic Engagement at Maine's Colby College. "There's no evidence that it's going to happen, but there's very clear evidence that it's an effective campaign tactic."

Gay marriage opponents discovered the effectiveness in last year's successful effort to pass Proposition 8 to outlaw gay marriage in California.

Story continues below

After signing up to lead the campaign, political consultants Frank Schubert and Jeff Flint noticed that polls were showing voters tended to not have much of a problem with gay relationships.

With the help of focus groups, surveys and ammunition unwittingly supplied by their opponents, the two soon found a new way to frame the issue by focusing on education. It's not the first time gay marriage opponents have played the education card, but not until the California campaign did it became the preferred strategy. That is a departure from elections in recent years when the focus was almost solely on the argument that marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman

Schubert said he had an ah-ha moment in California when a focus group watched a campaign commercial featuring a Massachusetts couple who described how their 7-year-old son came home from school and explained that a man can marry another man, something he learned in a children's book.

One of the members of the focus group shook his head, and Schubert asked the moderator to inquire. The participant said he would be angry if something like that that happened to his kids.

Recent comments

There are over 250,000 children being raised by homosexual...

Here's the thing... | Nov. 7, 2009 at 9:55 a.m.

Alerting parents that their children will be indoctrinated that...

Indoctrination Immoral | Nov. 7, 2009 at 7:06 a.m.

"Scaring people that their children or grand children will be...

Freedom 2 marry if they agree | Nov. 7, 2009 at 4:57 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Liberal because LDS

It's so absurd to say that taxes are the same as stealing. And you want...

What a bunch of crap. Why do you think that only Christian people shop...

George lost in rivalry hatefest

Why, because he spoke his heat? Because he told the truth? I take it when...

I don't get it. Permit and tag fees seem to always go up, but hunting days...

Do you really think foreign travel will be a thing of the past? Are you...

Blessed are the conservatives?

Liberal or byassed translations is why I took Biblical Greek courses. I have...

Jazz outrun Pacers

"Legend" thats you John....That would be a great trade better than any I can...

Higher school math requirements?

If you(r)kid is so smart, do you realize that any math class taken before the...

Jazz outrun Pacers

My first reaction to the uniforms was that the Jazz front office went nuts...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

After reading a dozen or more of these comments the parable of the "Wheat and...

Advertisements