Man convicted in Motel 6 murder set free

Attorneys agree he didn't get a fair trial in 1996 death at motel

Published: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:37 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

David Valken-Leduc woke up in a prison cell Tuesday morning but slept in a real bed last night as a free man.

After serving five years in prison, Valken-Leduc was ordered to be released Tuesday because all attorneys involved agreed he did not get a fair trial in the Motel 6 shooting death of night clerk Matthew John Whicker in Woods Cross on Oct. 29, 1996.

Valken-Leduc, now 30, was convicted by a jury in 2004 of first-degree felony murder and was sentenced to six years to life in prison by 2nd District Judge Glen Dawson.

However, Dawson vacated the conviction Tuesday, and Valken-Leduc entered an Alford plea to second-degree felony manslaughter as part of a plea bargain. The judge put Valken-Leduc on probation for three years.

An Alford plea means a defendant acknowledges that prosecutors have enough evidence to convict him, but the individual is not admitting he committed the crime.

Elizabeth Hunt, the attorney for Valken-Leduc's appeal, said her client is simply happy to be free.

"He had a big smile" after the hearing, Hunt said.

Story continues below

Valken-Leduc "loves math," she said, and now plans to attend college to earn both undergraduate and master's degrees. He had been taking classes in prison and has qualified for a two-year associate degree, although he has not received it yet.

"A friend of his mother — who passed away after he was first charged — is in town and will help him get on his feet," Hunt said, adding that this family friend has provided Valken-Leduc a place to live. "He also has family members out of state he hopes to connect with."

Hunt said her client agreed to the plea to resolve the case but has never admitted any involvement in Whicker's slaying, which is why Hunt said she insisted on the Alford plea.

"It allowed him to get out of prison, which is a dangerous place to be, and the funding for education has dried up. His case on appeal has dragged on forever, through no fault of his own," she said.

Davis County Attorney Troy Rawlings said Hunt had raised several issues on appeal, including ineffective assistance of counsel.

Hunt had received affidavits from Valken-Leduc's original trial attorney, Aric Cramer, in which Cramer admitted he did not hire an investigator to go through all of the evidence available, did not call key witnesses that could have countered prosecution witnesses and failed to preserve certain legal issues for appeal — all of which might have produced a different outcome.

Recent comments

Also, I don't know if you know this... but Todd Rettenberger (the man...

re: a friend | June 17, 2009 at 6:18 p.m.

I know. It's frustrating. Newspaper and TV writers are limited on...

RE: re: A Friend | June 17, 2009 at 5:11 p.m.

Why couldn't the news writer have included this same information on...

RE: A Friend | June 17, 2009 at 4:57 p.m.

Image
via Ksl-tv, All

Matthew John Whicker

previousnext

Latest comments

so sorry to hear this terrible news..much sincer condolences to the her family.

Time for him to go. PAST time for him to go.

After reading many comments posted on several stories since the incident...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Hey, I was at that Pres. Holland devotional, too. It was the year after the...

Sometimes when we loose we win, but not in this case. Want a future?...

First Meeting Utah, 12—4 (1896) Last Meeting BYU,...

Utahns growing tired of Bennett

I am!

Max Hall's only mistake was hating the sinner instead of the sin. He...

Kind of refreshing isn't it, Lee.

Philpot may run for Congress

I voted for Morgan for Vice Chair, and I think he would still be worth voting...

Advertisements