Burress told police he wasn't in 2005 shooting

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2009 3:17 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
LEBANON, Pa. — Plaxico Burress told police that he had no knowledge of a 2005 shooting incident in the Bronx in which two people were seen firing rounds from a sport-utility truck the New York Giants star borrowed from a dealer.

The oft-troubled New York Giants receiver ended up in a lawsuit over the truck, as a Lebanon, Pa., dealer sued Burress for damaging the 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche and failing to return it.

A civil trial began Wednesday afternoon in Pennsylvania. Burress and the car dealer, Frederick Laurenzo, gave conflicting accounts during the first 90 minutes of testimony. Laurenzo said he spoke by telephone to Burress and the agent, Robert Bailey, and had a verbal agreement about the details of the deal, in which Burress was to make promotional appearances for the dealership and was not to let anybody else drive the car.

Burress said he simply asked his agent to get a car for him and that he never spoke to Laurenzo about any conditions.

There was no mention during the initial testimony about how the truck ended up in the midst of a shooting incident in New York City.

According to New York police, officers saw two men firing off rounds from inside the truck on a Bronx street early on Aug. 20, 2005. It did not, however, appear that they were targeting anyone, police said.

Story continues below
Officers recovered two 9-mm pistols at the scene and arrested two people, one of them a cousin of Burress, police said.

Investigators contacted Burress, who came in with a lawyer more than two weeks later for questioning. Burress signed a statement saying he had loaned the car to a cousin, but that he had no knowledge of the incident and was at practice at the time of the shooting.

Burress' attorney Benjamin Brafman says he was told that at the time of the incident Burress was with the team at a New Jersey hotel because the Giants had a home preseason game later that day.

Giants spokesman Pat Hanlon declined to discuss Burress' exact whereabouts at the time of the shooting.

Charges against Burress' cousin were dropped. The other person in the car pleaded guilty in March 2006 to criminal possession of a weapon, police said.

Police said they released the car to the dealer in January 2007.

Laurenzo said the vehicle was worth more than $36,000, but he loaned it to Burress because the NFL star agreed to sign autographs at promotional events.

Laurenzo filed a civil complaint in September 2006 seeking restitution and accusing Burress of breach of contract because he never showed up to sign autographs and let someone else drive the vehicle. Laurenzo also said Burress made no effort to help him get the damaged vehicle back.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Get out of the bubble and live life!

Somehow you managed to miss the entire point of my argument, didn't you? It...

Too bad more people haven't gotten over the gotta-have-it shopping. We are...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

To Re Roland Kayser 8:34: Today's recession is fundamentally different from...

Germany celebrates fall of Wall

Shame, on all those so called Americans. That have kind words of dictators,...

Remember when the Jazz used to come back from being down by 17? Okur was...

I for one, even as a Cougar fan, am disappointed to see the turn that New...

Kim is a All-Tournament candidate in my opinion.

Wow, this story just won't end. If the LDS Church's stance on gay rights is...

Williams shot 20% (2 of 10) from the field, and was 0 of 5 from the arc and...

House passes health care bill

Please provide one single reform in healthcare that is provided in this bill....

Advertisements
Advertisement