Changes to iTunes prices raise music labels' hopes

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2009 2:12 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

LOS ANGELES — Although Apple Inc. announced this month that some songs sold on its market-leading iTunes online service would be available for 69 cents instead of the 99-cent tag Apple had insisted on for years, the change won't necessarily put more money into the pockets of music lovers.

In fact, record companies are the ones that plan to come out ahead.

While some songs will be 30 cents cheaper, popular songs likely will be marked up to $1.29. That price breaks a psychological $1 barrier and prepares consumers for a new strategy by labels to bundle songs, videos and other exclusive content together — all in the hopes of reversing years of falling music sales.

According to NPD analyst Russ Crupnick, the music industry has been faced with a vexing question as fans bought more digital singles but fewer albums: "As the album as we know it goes away, how do we replace a $12 or $13 item with something that costs more than 99 cents?"

If the new variable pricing can make several songs packaged together seem like a relative discount, it could finally entice some consumers to pay more.

"You've got them spending $4, when yesterday they were spending 99 cents," Crupnick said. "Is this going to be the salvation of the industry? No. But all these incremental things that we do will be helpful."

Story continues below

Music sales have declined in seven of the last eight years. The industry peaked in 2000, only to face the advent of the file-sharing program Napster, which made it easy for people to trade songs for free. Since Apple CEO Steve Jobs introduced iTunes in 2003, downloads of single digital tracks have exploded, but not in the volumes necessary to offset what last year was a 20 percent drop in sales of physical albums, which hold 10 songs or more.

The ability to increase online sales by charging 69 cents for some tracks, while reaping higher profits on more popular songs at $1.29, was so important to record labels that until last week they had withheld licensing of over-the-air downloads to Apple's iPhone, keeping it a somewhat dysfunctional mobile music gadget. Wireless music purchases on the iPhone had previously been possible only inside Wi-Fi hot spots.

Now that Apple and the music business both got what they wanted, the pricing changes figure to be replicated on other song-selling sites as their existing music-licensing deals expire.

"I think it's going to affect everyone's pricing but I don't think it's negative," said Bill Nguyen, co-founder of music retailing site lala.com, which sells songs for 89 and 99 cents and songs that can be played only online for 10 cents. "You're going to get more bundling. There'll be more discounts."

Recent comments

Perhaps if new music was worth buying.....

Thinking for myself | Jan. 15, 2009 at 10:11 a.m.

This is true. The music market has gone down in the last 7 of 8...

Kiersten Roden-McCarthy | Jan. 14, 2009 at 2:42 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Play safe boys and girls and no one gets hurt. Fireworks are an American...

Why do the Jazz continue to settle for mediocrity? Look at the rest of the...

Do you know any poor doctors? Why not? Because there has been a price...

Prices* not places

Obama deserves bashing

Bush is the most hated/bashed president in history even though he removed an...

The penalties in these theft cases seem to be too light to me - they seem...

Obviously it is worth $75 million, all you need to do is look around. People...

Why do we think we have to pick everyone apart because we don't have the same...

Our family had an AWESOME day at the parade and subsequent festival. The only...

"Hate mongers" -- I'm beginning to think that those who use that term are the...

Advertisements