Groups threaten to sue over oil-shale projects

Published: Saturday, Jan. 10, 2009 8:47 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
DENVER — Environmental groups are threatening to sue the federal government to block plans for commercial oil-shale development on nearly 2 million acres of public land in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.

Twelve groups sent letters tto the Interior Department and Bureau of Land Management last week saying they will sue unless the potential impacts on endangered species are addressed.

They argue the final plan and rules approved late last year violated federal law because the agencies didn't formally consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

"They cut Fish and Wildlife Service out of it," said Melissa Thrailkill, an attorney with Center for Biological Diversity in San Francisco.

Documents obtained by the groups under the Freedom of Information Act show that Fish and Wildlife Service biologists were concerned about "information gaps" in the BLM's environmental analysis. The biologists suggested barring leases in habitat for threatened or sensitive species, the documents show.

"In its rush to pave the way for oil-shale development before leaving the office, the Bush administration broke the law once again by refusing to protect the West's endangered wildlife," Thrailkill said.

BLM spokesman Matt Spangler said the agency had no comment on the environmental groups' claims.

Story continues below
Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter and other state officials have urged federal officials to delay a final plan and rules for commercial oil-shale development, saying there are too many unanswered questions about the effects on water, wildlife, air and local economies.

They point out that companies are still experimenting with the technology and that industry and government officials acknowledge that commercial development is several years away.

In November, Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal asked the BLM to remove the Adobe Town badlands in southwest Wyoming from land available for lease.

The Bush administration released the final plan for opening the land to shale development in November, a few weeks after a congressional ban on using federal funds to write final regulations expired.

One of the ban's sponsors was Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., nominated by President-elect Barack Obama to head the Interior Department.

Shale deposits in northwest Colorado, Wyoming and Utah are thought to hold more than 1 trillion barrels of oil. About 800 billion barrels of that are believed to be recoverable.

Four companies have received 160-acre parcels of public land for oil-shale demonstration projects in Colorado and Utah, and Shell Exploration & Production has been running tests on private land in Western Colorado since the mid-1990s.

Recent comments

Good for those advocating the lawsuit. I agree we need alternative...

Wes | Jan. 11, 2009 at 6:56 p.m.

per gallon, oil shale is never going to be a viable fuel. Let them...

Even at $4 | Jan. 11, 2009 at 11:12 a.m.

Once gas goes back up to $4 and beyond the resistance to oil shale...

Rick | Jan. 11, 2009 at 10:11 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Maybe "our best" should use better judgement and stop enabling this country's...

When renting any property there are only two things you should worry about....

5A teams best of decade

Which one of these is not like the others. Skyline- Champions 2005 ...

Did you boo Derek Fisher when he came back the next year? (Also you mean...

The Timpview and Mt. Crest winner still has to play one more game, lets not...

As hard as it is to hear the ranting and hate being spued from these...

As a rule of thumb I never, ever pull for the Ewe. This week is no different.

It's not "hate" that is promoted. There are many opinions, which is good, but...

If I own an apartment building, it is my private property. No one should be...

Letters: Strange breed in Utah

Apparently Mr. Lowery listens to these gentleman in some detail or he...

Advertisements
Advertisement