Retail thefts soaring as the economy slides

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2009 1:33 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Ken Beckstrom wishes he could see what his security cameras must have captured a few weeks ago: Thieves so desperate for loot that they risked the possibility of jail time to pillage through shelves of $1 items at his Just A Buck store in Roy.

But he won't get that chance. They carried off the security videotapes with the candy bars.

"Cleaned out," Beckstrom said. "It's that simple, and the rest of us can just drop dead for all they care."

The moonlit heist a few weeks ago hit him hard enough that it killed his business. He let his nine employees go after he opened his doors for one last time in late December to try to sell the sparse inventory that remained.

Seldom is a business hit with a one-time theft bad enough to bankrupt it, but Beckstrom and many other retailers in Utah are now more vulnerable to that possibility.

Retailers are offering steep discounts and low prices in this recession-stricken economy. But a growing crowd of Utahns don't want to shop for less — they want to shop for free.

Data from police agencies across the state show a strong correlation between the free-fall curve of the continuing economic slump and a sharp spike in the state's retail theft rate.

Story continues below
"I am absolutely positive there's a relationship," said Jim Wood, economist with the University of Utah's Bureau of Economic and Business Research. "When you don't have a job and your 4-year-old wants or needs something, it's tough for people."

Apparently, it's tough for retailers, too. The Global Retail Theft Barometer found that U.S. retailers spent close to $12 billion in 2007 on attempts to curb the growing theft trend. But loss-prevention experts say companies may not have the money to keep fighting as hard in 2009.

Jack Trlica, editor of Loss Prevention Magazine, says it's an unfortunate irony that when retailers need security the most, shortfalls in their budgets may be allowing them less. "It's a cycle — a vicious one," he said.

Trlica said executives have two choices: "If they are forward-thinking and understand the long-term benefits, they won't touch, and may increase, their loss-prevention budget."

But, he said, "if they're a bottom-line, numbers-oriented executive who thinks they need to save money right now, they'll cut the (security) budgets."

Trlica said the consequences may show instant savings but will turn up in six months to haunt them during inventory. "They simply see (loss prevention) as an expense line and not as a potential profit line in their reports."

Recent comments

We are just very greedy people. No matter who you are or what you...

emma | Jan. 11, 2009 at 7:39 a.m.

RE: Midwest Voyeur

I agree. But I think the word you're looking...

Fear-mongering | Jan. 7, 2009 at 2:56 p.m.

I never used to read the comments section, but more and more I find...

Midwest Voyeur | Jan. 7, 2009 at 10:06 a.m.

Image

Lila Tyner, Roy, looks at remaining items at Just A Buck, forced to close due to a merchandise theft.

previousnext

Latest comments

So are you saying that women's soccor should evolve into this type of...

The Church has never been about hating gays, or any other group. It has only...

Hatch empathizes with Muslims

To which I add Amen, and Amen! [Thank you!]

RSL in win-Windy City situation

this is going to so much fun? Gee who do i cheer for if REAL plays Galaxy? ...

Hall would rather take a hit

The great QBs make defenses pay for bringing pressure. Hall offers up...

I completely concur, this exhibition game was supposed to be easy and a blow...

Maybe we should just back up 50 years and do away with all laws etc. passed...

So does Hall enjoy absorbing the contact as Call says, or in Hall's own...

Well put, let it die. A lot people who want the health care bill haven't...

D-Will, Price sit out Jazz practice

If Jerry studies "game tape" he will see how to beat the Celtics, see Phoenix...

Advertisements
Advertisement