From Deseret News archives:

'Twilight' addresses sex in a safe way

Published: Saturday, Dec. 6, 2008 12:33 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

Is the movie "Twilight," with its racing hearts, racing cars and racing hormones, really "smut for good girls," as some have suggested?

Of course not — anymore than the game of football is "gang warfare for good boys."

Just as football is a socially acceptable way for young boys to unbridle their aggressions, "Twilight" is a way for girls to handle their budding sexuality in a safe and symbolic way.

If you don't believe that, go see the movie.

My wife and I did. And I was more impressed with what author Stephenie Meyer has pulled off than she was.

It is a movie with all the longing, danger and intrigue of sex, without the sex. In fact, Meyer has knitted almost every type of love story into the fabric of her story from "Beauty and the Beast" to "Running Bear Loved Little White Dove." Yet, at heart, the movie simply asks that age-old fairy tale question — Little Red Riding Hood's question:

"Is that gentle, caring soul before me someone I can trust, or a wolf waiting to eat me alive?"

Some believe Meyer calculated the whole "Twilight" phenomenon — that she took the pulse of popular culture, checked the best-seller charts and produced a packaged product for the market that was a guaranteed hit.

Story continues below

I don't think so. The story just doesn't feel like that. It feels more like a young author who knew her own heart, knew who her natural audience was and set out to share her heart with her readers. The audience simply turned out to be several million more souls than she anticipated.

One thing I like about the film is most of the male characters — from the dutiful, clueless, divorced dad to the humanitarian vampire dad — were positive.

A second thing I like is that the movie shows "the more things change, the more they stay the same."

In an age when young girls are raised on Britney Spears and spend their days mastering intricate cell phone maneuvers that would baffle astronauts, the girls of today still "want a guy just like the guys that dated dear old Mom."

Back in the 1960s, young girls went all gooey over good-looking, athletic guys with hot cars and a knack with clever dance steps.

That pretty much describes Meyer's pulsing, heartthrob vampire, Edward, to a T.

But more than that, he listens to classical music and always has his girlfriend's back whenever she dawdles into danger.

Fangs or no, that's a guy you wouldn't mind introducing to the folks.

As for those who say romance writing like this is simply "smut for women," the comment speaks well of them in a way.

Any man who would say such a thing has no idea what real smut is.

The comment is also a dead give away that the guy hasn't bothered to see the movie.

E-mail: jerjohn@desnews.com

Recent comments

I think you described the book and the movie perfectly. Well done.

Anonymous | Jan. 7, 2009 at 2:47 p.m.

I love Twilight. It is soooo awesome. Stephenie Meyer is a genius.

Bella | Jan. 2, 2009 at 8:30 p.m.

I don't understand the article. Yes, in Twilight Edward and Bella...

Megan | Dec. 20, 2008 at 4:13 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Knitting people together

If you would like to email Janalee, her correct email...

Well, here we are again. Teachers implying "it's not my fault the students...

I heard of this tragedy on Saturday from my sister who is connected to the...

Many of you are missing the point. The booster seat law is ALREADY LAW. It...

Group cancels 2nd mission to Haiti

The main issue is that this is largely a medical group but what is needed...

Utah women voted earlier than most

I never said polygamy wasn't legal. I simply called into question your...

Good to at least hear an honest idiute - there aren't many of you. I have no...

Maybe ALL government employees should start being paid based on performance....

Grappling titles up for grabs

Its very tough when you have to wrestle back through after a dissapointing...

NH against gay marriage repeal

In my previous post I quoted Article VI when I intended to quote Article IV.

Advertisements