Ethics panel to hold hearing on Hughes

It also decides to keep the public, press out of meetings

Published: Thursday, Oct. 9, 2008 12:14 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The House Ethics Committee voted Wednesday to undertake a formal hearing on alleged unethical behavior by Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper.

In the process, all but two committee members voted to close the hearing to the public and press. The committee even voted not to allow at least one media representative, a Salt Lake Tribune editor, to argue that the meeting be kept open.

An ethics hearing against Rep. Phil Riesen, D-Salt Lake, charged by Hughes and other GOP lawmakers that Riesen broke ethics rules by leaking the Hughes complaint to the press, will be held later — perhaps next week, perhaps later.

Hughes and Riesen both deny all charges lodged against them.

One Hughes accuser, former GOP Rep. Susan Lawrence, testified in private Wednesday afternoon. She declined to comment when she came out of the closed hearing late in the day.

However, Hughes' attorney, Thomas Karrenberg, said Lawrence testified that she never intended for her complaint against Hughes to be made public or be turned into a formal ethics charge. (Hughes and his attorney were allowed into the closed-door sessions and are not sworn to secrecy, like committee members and staff are.)

Story continues below

Lawrence reportedly stood by her letter, signed and addressed "to whom it may concern." That letter is part of the formal charge against Hughes and alleges that Hughes in 2006 offered her up to $50,000 in campaign funds if she would vote for private school vouchers, or at the very least walk off the House floor and not vote on vouchers at all.

Hughes' attorney said Lawrence said she didn't believe an ethics complaint against Hughes was appropriate, in part because the Legislature's ethics definitions are so vague as to be meaningless.

Karrenberg said listening to testimony "there is no way this conversation" between Lawrence and Hughes "could be considered a bribe, no way."

The formal hearing against Hughes is no surprise. Hughes himself asked that the hearing be held and be held and concluded quickly "to clear my good name."

Hughes told the Deseret News he's heard his hearing could last two days to three weeks. The committee scheduled hearings at least through next week.

Before the hearing was closed, Hughes said: "Bluntly, I don't have 21 days of bad press left in my political career. I have to get this over with (before the Nov. 4 election). I have to prove my innocence in the public, quickly.

"My campaign is on hold. All my brochures that are now in the can are worthless."

Both Hughes and Riesen didn't get what they both wanted — open ethics hearings. Testimony will be taken in private.

The open part of the hearing Wednesday was well orchestrated, with chairman Todd Kiser, R-Sandy, and co-chairman Rep. Lou Shurtliff, D-Ogden, reading prepared statements and motions.

Recent comments

I've been an observer of many meetings on capital hill, both...

Under suspension of the rules... | Oct. 9, 2008 at 5:34 p.m.

Just a note to clear up some issues. 1st This is an 8 person...

Calm Head | Oct. 9, 2008 at 3:44 p.m.

This story appeared on the front page of the printed version, along...

Reason | Oct. 9, 2008 at 2:02 p.m.

Image
Laura Seitz, Deseret News

Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper, is undergoing a formal House Ethics Committee investigation involving six charges.

previousnext

Latest comments

It certainly won't solve all their problems, but shooting a film in the...

I am in my 60's and I love Harry Potter. I went to Korea in 2000 with the...

Firms want health reform

Re: Hey Canadian Such scare tactics!! You make it sound like BIG BROTHER...

Our hearts and prayers are with you. John Rey will be missed by staff and...

It was the interpretation and idea to originally "Burn" it, so it was burned...

Trivia about time

Then there's 09:09:09 09/09/09. Wow, all the possibilities.

In addition to the great testimonials about the Swim Kids program, I must add...

Trivia about time

And next year we'll have 05:06:07 08/09/10. Big deal.

my family was there to see the Jonas Brothers

Such a big and special moment for all those who attended, only to find out...

Advertisements