Legislators to propose more restrictive abortion law

Doctors would be required to say if a fetus will feel pain

Published: Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2008 8:59 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
After a lull in their effort to make abortion illegal except in cases of rape, incest or bodily harm to the mother, conservative state lawmakers are drafting legislation to end "the slaughter of innocents" once and for all, even if it means fighting all the way to the Supreme Court.

Rep. Carl Wimmer, R-Herriman, said that just because the abortion battle has been quiet the past year, it by no means has gone away.

"The slaughter continues, and so does our commitment to stop it," he said. "We'll be stepping it up, and we're standing up for the unborn and against those who get rid of them as a matter of convenience and want abortion on demand."

New legislation will reconstitute strategies to not only make abortion illegal with three exceptions, but would require doctors to notify a pregnant woman if an abortion is painful to the fetus, that the procedure they're about to undergo will end a human life and that abuse of a pregnant mother causing her to lose a fetus would be a felony.

Rep. Stephen Sandstrom, R-Orem, who proposed the same steps a year ago in legislation that failed to pass, said ending abortion in Utah had been kind of a piecemeal approach.

Story continues below

"The fact then and the fact now is that no matter the approach, people in Utah want to put a wholesale stop on abortion," Sandstrom said. "Lawmakers are in effect ignoring what their constituents want. This is the critical thing we keep ignoring by ignoring this."

Utah passed a ban on abortion in 1991, but it was not enacted under court orders.

Sandstrom said he realizes he's picking an expensive and drawn-out fight. Estimates by proponents and opponents alike put the price tag anywhere from $3 million to $12 million.

Missy Bird, executive director of the Planned Parenthood Action Committee, said that's a bill that Utahns don't want.

"Every person I know is against abortions, but as usual, the focus remains on the procedure, not on preventing the pregnancy," Bird said.

That's because it needs to be stopped, now, Sandstrom said. "We have a responsibility to protect and defend life. I take that as much more than political action, it's only right and the moral thing to do."


E-mail: jthalman@desnews.com

Recent comments

It's absurd to use the excuse that this bill would lead to back alley...

KS | Oct. 7, 2008 at 11:56 a.m.

What does the non-sectarian legislature expect to gain by...

Robin | Oct. 2, 2008 at 12:09 p.m.

Is it "people want a wholesale stop on abortion" or "people want a...

Convenient | Oct. 2, 2008 at 11:10 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Until you have fought a long corner going 30 MPH on ice, you really have no...

There have been chickens in our neighborhood in Springville for the more than...

Kevin is extremely qualified for this position and listens to the little...

Education (K-12) is generally a state's largest budget item. The Supreme...

A narrow snapshot in time and geography is meaningless. I can't believe the...

Did Michelle wear something inappropriate or man handle the Pontiff. I hear...

Bernick, keep drinking the Koolaide. You state that Conservatives are...

Since 1998 the Honda Civic GX has been recognized EVERY YEAR as the cleanest...

Science is not settled

So, even if the issue is not "settled", does it mean we should not be better...

Obama controls all

Yeah? Look at all the GOP still defending their dead and irrelevant party to...

Advertisements