From Deseret News archives:

LDS Church issues statement on same-sex marriage

Document praised, criticized by group of gay members

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2008 12:23 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Top leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints recently released a six-page statement on why the faith is opposed to same-sex marriage.

The document, titled "The Divine Institution of Marriage," has garnered both praise and derision from Affirmation, a group of gay Latter-day Saints.

The document was posted on the church's Web site, www.lds.org, in the "newsroom" section last month, and leaders of Affirmation issued a press release late last week in response.

Latter-day Saints in Utah and around the country know the church is one of several faith organizations that are actively supporting Proposition 8, which would overturn the California Supreme Court's legalization of gay marriage earlier this year. If approved by voters in November, the proposition would amend that state's constitution to read, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

Story continues below
The new LDS Church document follows the release of a letter in June from the faith's First Presidency to church members in California, asking for their donations of time and money in support of Proposition 8. The new document is an expansion of past statements made by the church in response to questions about its reasons for opposing same-sex marriage. The "introduction" section of the document may surprise some church members with its stance on some legal questions that have surfaced in Utah and elsewhere regarding domestic partnership rights.

"The church does not object to rights (already established in California) regarding hospitalization and medical care, fair housing and employment rights, or probate rights, so long as these do not infringe on the integrity of the family or the constitutional rights of churches and their adherents to administer and practice their religion free from government interference," the introduction says.

Those California rights apply not only to same-sex couples, but also to other kinds of domestic partnerships.

In October 2004, the First Presidency's office issued a statement saying the church "favors measures that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman and that do not confer legal status on any other sexual relationship."

That statement came two weeks before Utah voters were to decide whether to amend the Beehive State's constitution, not only to define marriage as the "legal union between a man and a woman," but also to prevent any other domestic union from being "recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect."

Recent comments

Is it simply about the word "marriage"? Homo-sexuals want to use it...

Simply wondering | Nov. 11, 2008 at 3:32 p.m.

Why are Mormons so surprised that they are the target for those that...

alan Wheeler | Nov. 10, 2008 at 10:27 p.m.

Wow. These postings are amazing. It's frightening to see how many...

cee5 | Nov. 9, 2008 at 11:18 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

guns don't kill people....people with guns kill people.

Letters: No gay temple marriage

"It is simple, if you don't want "Gay Marriage", don't have one. But don't...

5A: Bingham 35, Davis 24

Your absolutly right, they do need to adjust coaching at Davis, get rid of...

Wright runs for Utah Co. Commission

There's a reason the job growth that does exist in Utah is going to Salt Lake...

Utes turn attention to rivalry

Some of our fans were very unsportsman-like tonight. There was a lot of...

As long as Taylor Oldroyd is running the Utah County GOP or in any way shape...

Utah Utes whip SDSU

Hey Zoobs will you Egg the Coaches car and abuse Mrs Maxie after you lose...

I love the idiocy of the BYU Utah rivalry. Fans (especially those from BYU)...

Here we go again...ANOTHE CHAD LEWIS STORY! Is he the only active or retired...

THIS SHOULD BE YOUR YEAR! Senior QB, senior all-star TE, fantatic RB,...

Advertisements