Fractured policing is not good

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2008 12:22 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Cottonwood Heights celebrated the start of its new police force this week. The good news is it might be the last new police force formed in Salt Lake County.

We understand why Cottonwood Heights wanted to break away from the county sheriff's office. It's an age-old story. The sheriff's budget ultimately must be approved by the County Council and the mayor, and they budget with the needs of all county departments in mind. For cities that contract with the sheriff, such a politically laden system offers little assurance that individual cities will have their local needs considered in the budget.

And, of course, there are always anecdotal tales of crimes in which deputies took an unacceptably long time to respond.

But fracturing the county into several independent police departments, each with its own chief, policies and rules, is not a good thing for the people of Salt Lake County. The valley may be home to many cities, but most residents are quite mobile during the day. They live in one city and work in another, and they may shop or attend cultural events in yet another. And they may require police services from any of these cities, whether or not they pay taxes there.

Story continues below

Likewise, criminals do not necessarily confine themselves to city limits. A robber may hit a number of banks or convenience stores in several jurisdictions. A unified countywide police force would best be able to serve the 1 million or so people who live in Salt Lake County.

Earlier this year, state lawmakers passed SB253, a bill that allows the Salt Lake County sheriff to begin negotiating with police departments to form a unified police force. Such a force would be governed by a board on which would sit representatives from each city. This would ensure that cities have a bit more say in the budgeting process.

Efforts to form a unified police force have failed in the past, mainly because cities felt they would be losing too much control. Clearly, the best sort of policing effort would be one in which cities could control their own levels of response to crime, but in a cooperative way that coordinates law enforcement countywide.

That sort of thing may be impossible to achieve so long as the county contains several police chiefs, but it is a goal worth pursuing. SB253, which the governor signed into law, also specifies that if no unified police force has been established by May 5, 2009, the County Council can step in and negotiate one without the sheriff's approval.

We hope that prod works.

Recent comments

Look at metro fire, nothing but extra sticker on my city's fire...

Metro Fire?? | Sept. 3, 2008 at 10:35 p.m.

It has nothing to do with control issues of the individual city...

Look to Metro Fire Agency | Sept. 3, 2008 at 11:10 a.m.

This is all about petty control issues of mayors and city councils...

Anonymous | Sept. 3, 2008 at 10:03 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

If taxes go up any more (ie, to generate the 600 billion dollars dems want)...

Well if this is true the Blazers sure get a great deal. Why is it that...

Farming for the needy

Thanks to Saratoga Crops Manager Steve Wood for making that farm a success....

Do more traveling

"What lies at the end of the street? (asks the new high school student). ...

is pretty area and I do hope they stay small.

Are you serious Miles? Thomas is not a bust at all. He is up and down but...

A.K., Booze & Miles to Chicago for Miller, Hindrich, & Thomas. Throw Maynor &...

Single-payer system best

IF you turn this over to the government, it WILL be deciding who gets...

makes sense for them. What is in this for the Jazz? Ty Thomas only makes 4+...

I remember Walter Cronkite giving everyone instructions on how to set up...

Advertisements