Fidelity in DNA? Researchers find 'monogamy gene' in men
Genetic trait was first found in prairie voles
Investigators have long known the gene that controls the hormone vasopressin is responsible for monogamy in prairie voles, small animals common in the grasslands of North America. Now researchers from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm have uncovered it in men and showed it may play a role in whether they and their spouses are happily married.
The researchers ran genetic tests on 2,186 participants in the Twin and Offspring Study in Sweden and had them fill out a survey about the quality of their marriage. Men with a genetic variation scored significantly lower on a scale of partner bonding. One in three reported a crisis in their marriage within the past year, twice the number as those without the variation.
"This really shows that in humans, even complex social behavior like our relationships have a biological root," said Larry Young, a professor of psychiatry at Emory University in Atlanta, who has done similar gene research in animals. While the findings need to be confirmed, "if it does hold up, it's a really intriguing story," he said in a telephone interview.
The results published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences held up when the researchers asked women about their relationships. Those whose husbands had one or two copies of the gene variation scored significantly lower on tests asking about their marriage quality than those without it.
The gene was previously linked to other aspects of human behavior, including autism, age at first sexual intercourse and altruism. Those findings don't confirm the significance of the gene, though they do show a consistent pattern, Young said.
"You can imagine that a gene that would cause social deficits in autism would also cause you to have trouble in your personal relationships," he said.
Paul Lichtenstein, the senior author of the paper from the Karolinska Institute, said people shouldn't over-interpret the results. The gene alone can't predict a successful relationship, and it should never be used as a litmus test before marriage.
"This doesn't explain how you succeed in a relationship, but it gives us an understanding of why people bond," said Lichtenstein, a professor of genetic epidemiology. "It gives you a predisposition, but it doesn't determine how successful you will be in marriage."
Young agreed. While people want to know before they get into a committed relationship whether their chances are dimmed by genetics, there is no way to know that, he said.
"In a large population, people who have this particular variant in general will have more troubles in their marriages," Young said. "But you could never genotype one person and predict what their marriage is going to be like. There are many other factors."
Recent comments
So do the people who lack this gene define themselves as being non...
I was born this way | Sept. 2, 2008 at 9:47 a.m.
This is bunk. The real reason why a man remains faithful is because...
Fact: | Sept. 2, 2008 at 9:12 a.m.
So what's new? All behavior has biological, psychological, and...
News Junkie | Sept. 2, 2008 at 8:36 a.m.
- 'Drop Dead Diva' is frothy fun 6:14 p.m.
- Vail's mountain cross inspiring 6:14 p.m.
- Bishop on a mission 6:14 p.m.
- Look for face of God in others 6:14 p.m.
- Religion briefs 6:14 p.m.
- Teachings on adultery after Sanford 6:14 p.m.
- Church camps closing doors 6:14 p.m.
- Religion around the world 6:14 p.m.
- Did daughter not pay for car? 6:13 p.m.
- Ra Ra Riot brings groove to S.L. 6:13 p.m.
- LDS seminary principal arrested
- Jazz talking Boozer trade?
- Reactions on Boozer speculation
- Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake
- Jazz in back of line for free agents
- A primer for the 6th Potter film
- Okur signs two-year extension
- Jazz won't meet Lopez on Europe trip
- Restaurant destroyed by fire
- Mall owner seeks to retain zoning
- Bronco collecting a galaxy of recruits
141 - Letters: Palin mistreated
141 - Teachers struggle with district cuts
137 - LDS seminary principal arrested
135 - Jazz talking Boozer trade?
134 - Blazers may offer Millsap a contract
123 - Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake
91 - Moon landing: Let's hear from you
83 - Fairness of BCS debated
81 - Chaffetz eyes challenging Bennett
74
By now you've probably read about the investigation that showed just how...
The recent Poly camp in Bountiful opened the eyes of recruiters to at...
Brown is ANOTHER teams property, the jazz can't sign him.
Actually it was Mr. Rush Limbaugh who invented the Internet. Rush knows...
Boozer you deserve a team like Sac, we will take Nocioni and their first...
Hear Hear! Excellent letter from a man with a most excellent name. (Yes,...
What a great organization! Good luck in helping children, families, and...
I think you are ALL missing the obvious. Just skip the middleman portland...
Its a good thing YBU has Heaps, Apo, and Stout to use as recruiting power...
Assuming the charges are truthful, he has done a lot of damage to the...
The jazz need to let sap go for sure. 8+change is just too much, especially...
The letter is oversimplified. But then so is the assertion that CO2 can...

