From Deseret News archives:

Nuclear plant proposal fuels worries

Published: Sunday, Aug. 24, 2008 1:06 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Proposals for a uranium mill and nuclear power plant near Green River, Emery County, are raising more and more eyebrows.

A group that says it seeks to protect Utahns from nuclear and toxic waste wants to know where high-level radioactive waste will go if the state allows a nuclear power plant to be built in an industrial park on state trust land near Green River.

Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah members also told the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration board of directors during a meeting Tuesday that the state isn't maximizing the trust's revenue potential by exercising an option to give the nuclear-plant owners first dibs on 1,600 acres in the new industrial park six miles from Green River.

HEAL policy director Christopher Thomas told SITLA board members that the deal, which could benefit Emery County coffers, in effect puts a cap on the price of the 1,600 acres.

"As I understand it, other potential buyers will now have to get in line behind the nuclear power developer, even if they wanted to offer a higher bid for the land," Thomas said.

Thomas wants land in the industrial park opened up to bidders.

Story continues below
The proposed plant's waste stream is another sticking point for HEAL. Thomas said the plant developer should guarantee a disposal place before being allowed to set up shop near Green River.

"Without that assurance, we don't know how long we'll need to manage that waste on site, who's responsible for it after the plant's useful life and just how much it could cost," Thomas said.

If Yucca Mountain ever gets going as a waste site, HEAL is worried there won't be enough room to store waste there from a Utah reactor.

Some are touting the plant's benefits.

Earlier this year Heritage Foundation research fellow Jack Spencer wrote that a proposal to build two 1,500-megawatt reactors in Green River would provide Utahns with "clean and secure" energy while possibly lessening the blow on industry from efforts to reduce CO2 emissions, blamed for global warming.

But water issues for the mill and plant may be a long way from being resolved.

Last fall Rep. Aaron Tilton, R-Springville, talked about building two reactors somewhere in the state. Tilton is an owner of Transition Power Development. Water from one of the units could come from the Kane County Water Conservancy District, directed by Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab.

If the plant proposed for construction near Green River is built, it will be in the same industrial park as a planned uranium mill.

Recent comments

Thorium is the "Green" nuclear. Specifically LFTR (liquid fluoride...

charlesH | Aug. 24, 2008 at 8:12 p.m.

Ignore the NIMBY's and just build the plant!

Thinkin' Man | Aug. 24, 2008 at 2:41 p.m.

Put the nuclear waste on school trust land and help Utah education...

Keep Nuclear Waste in Utah | Aug. 24, 2008 at 10:27 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

If TCU runs the table, is it better for the MWC for TCU to play in a BCS...

We stand pretty much alone in cost vs benefit. We are far above other...

Max Hall has had a great career. It was been fun to watch him play. He will...

Crash kills Utah County man

"...this road, it's narrow, winding, and has many blind spots, as one would...

Celtics crush Jazz

Boston 7 = 21 Jazz 0 = 0 Jazz lose by 19. Math is simple.

These people probably thought they would get financing to begin the...

Duchesne developers charged

i used to live in the basin. these people spent more time breaking the law...

Where is Waterford High School?

is so wise. Simply a great coach. If you win, the BCS will call. No need...

'Pirate Radio' fun rock 'n' roll movie

Well, I'm personally glad we have a critic who doesn't judge a movie merely...

Advertisements
Advertisement