From Deseret News archives:

Politics, not principles, behind Pelosi's turnabout on oil drilling

Published: Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2008 12:45 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Oil prices have declined some, bringing down fuel costs, which still are well above what most Americans believe is reasonable. Trying to lessen futures speculation, which many believe has been a key factor in climbing prices, may be extremely difficult.

If the past is any pattern, the debate over the entire issue probably won't bring about any tangible bipartisan results until after the November elections and perhaps not even until the new Congress is elected when Democrats are expected to increase their majority. The Republicans certainly want to be able to blame the majority party for this dilemma, and the Democrats can't afford to give up too much ground at the risk of losing a chunk of their liberal constituency. The cynical view is that Congress acts decisively and responsibly only in a crisis; the rest of the time it finds a way to put off most politically explosive action.

But no one believes that lower prices are here to stay or, for that matter, will continue to decline steadily as they have in the past, muting determination by Americans to change their profligate usage. Then, of course, there are China and India, where demand to fuel enormous industrial and social growth, including millions of new cars, has been responsible for much of the soaring cost of oil.

Story continues below
Pelosi's sudden decision to allow a vote on drilling, if it holds, is a major turnaround considering that her opposition to exploration off the California coast dates from the first day she stepped on the House floor in 1987. She said before the recess that permitting a vote was merely an effort to divert attention from President Bush's failed energy policies, which, she charged, have increased the nation's dependence on foreign oil. Bush's defenders, what few of them remain, note that every time he has called for some bipartisan accommodation, Republicans as well as Democrats have refused.

Why Pelosi's change of heart? Well, when politics dictate. ...


E-mail Dan K. Thomasson, former editor of the Scripps Howard News Service, at thomassondan@aol.com.

Recent comments

"as part of a broader energy bill" is the key phrase here. Rep....

mmichaels | Aug. 20, 2008 at 2:57 p.m.

Stereotypical complaints out of context are interesting. Certainly...

Wondering | Aug. 19, 2008 at 9:14 p.m.

Pelosi rocks!
A true role model for the American women.

Anonymous | Aug. 19, 2008 at 7:49 p.m.

Image
Lauren Victoria Burke, Associated Press

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi with Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., in 2007, had opposed offshore drilling.

previousnext

Latest comments

I agree with Tami. You can't force those with no math aptitude to learn...

Mormon Messages on YouTube

Where does say God is not both? God has a Body and is a Spirit. It is...

2nd gay bishop for Episcopalians

Afraid? Religious institutions are not "afraid" of people who are different....

Bennett seeks to stall N-waste bill

. . . because it appears because I didn't donate more than $49,000 to Senator...

USU shows clear improvment

Utah State will take BYU to the wire... You heard it here first.

I agree with Cosmo, these professors are green with envy! They've never...

Boozer on an offensive tear

...and still Boozer gets no love from the Jazz faithfull. With all the...

Did the snowy roads cause the problem or was it bad drivers who don't know...

USU shows clear improvment

Can recruit some great athletes. We will never compete against Boise, Utah or...

Woman charged in identity theft case

Who'd name their kid "Gypsy"?

Advertisements