From Deseret News archives:

Qwest, Comcast spar over taxes

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2008 12:30 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Two powerhouse companies, Qwest Corp. and Comcast Corp., are battling over property taxes — specifically, who assesses them.

Qwest wants to amend an administrative rule so that the properties of Comcast and other cable companies would be treated the same as those of telecommunication companies, meaning they would be assessed by the state rather than local entities. At a Utah Tax Commission meeting Tuesday, Qwest attorney David Crapo said Comcast operates as a unit across county lines and therefore should be subject to state assessment.

Cable companies, once solely TV-programming providers, have moved "heavily into two-way communications," he said, adding that Comcast proclaims itself as the fourth-largest phone-service provider in the United States, with 190 million calls weekly placed through its "national network."

The companies' data, Internet and voice service "is interconnected through and across county lines, and through and across state lines and requires central assessment," Crapo said. "The time has come that the cable companies should be centrally assessed by this commission."

Story continues below
But Jerry Oldroyd, an attorney representing Comcast, said that Qwest's argument does not account for the "very localized nature" of cable-company operations. Never considered public utilities, cable companies are subject to local franchising authority — and in Utah, that means 130 agreements with local entities. "That's not like a public utility," Oldroyd said. "It's certainly not like a 'unit."'

And, he said, the service handling 190 million calls "is a data service, an Internet service." It is not a phone service and therefore is not regulated by the Utah Public Service Commission. "It's an Internet-based traffic," Oldroyd said.

Crapo, however, questioned that distinction. "It is a phone call," he said.

Salt Lake County Assessor Lee Gardner and John McCarrey, an assistant attorney general for the Utah Property Tax Division, said Comcast's operations appear to go over county lines. McCarrey also said that the state is better equipped than local assessors to assess cable companies' complex properties.

Oldroyd and several others are suggesting that the Legislature should decide whether cable companies are assessed by the state or locally. A letter to the tax commission from Senate Majority Leader Curt Bramble and Sen. Wayne Niederhauser, chairman of the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee, said they prefer that the matter be addressed by the Legislature. However, HB367, which would have had cable companies assessed by the state, died in committee during the 2008 general session.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Aren't there any laws to protect a baby from a name like "Bandit?"

This accident was caused by someone who was TEXTING WHILE DRIVING! Please...

too bad the jusdge wasn't gay, this guy would get a life withiut parole...

Corny, cheesy and over-the-top. I don't understand how anyone could watch and...

Finau can't hold lead

Good match! Did Mike ever find that driver he threw into the bushes? Hope...

Parliament of World's Religions

No worry, On 11/20/09, The Christian community Roman Catholic,Protestant and...

'You're a big man because you put your real name, "Pagan," as your ID.' -...

It would be dangerous for the church to organize a search party in the area...

To "mark | 2:23 p.m." I am aware of the "Bleeding Heart Tightwads". The...

J, Your ignorance shines through by the fact that it's evident you don't...

Advertisements