From Deseret News archives:

USIA needs to be revived to fight anti-Americanism

Published: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:11 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Each candidate in the presidential election has recognized the need, once in office, to galvanize public diplomacy to improve the image of the United States abroad.

Congress is also seized of the issue. A House subcommittee has held a series of hearings that affirm in recent years a "precipitous decline in favorability" toward the United States and its foreign policy.

At the urging of Congress, the Department of State, current home of the government's public diplomacy efforts, has commissioned a study to review the instruments and techniques needed to burnish the U.S. image. Three interested organizations, the Brookings Institution, the Business for Diplomatic Action group and the Washington-based Public Diplomacy Council, will conduct hearings in Washington, New York and Los Angeles in July to assess the views of interested parties.

Story continues below
Key to the debate is whether the government's public diplomacy, or "soft-power" effort, should remain based in the State Department or should become a separate institution. Republican candidate John McCain has already pronounced on his choice if he becomes president. In Foreign Affairs, he wrote: "In 1998 the Clinton administration and Congress mistakenly agreed to abolish the U.S. Information Agency and move its public diplomacy functions to the State Department. This amounted to unilateral disarmament in the war of ideas. I will work with Congress to create a new independent agency with the sole purpose of getting America's message to the world — a critical element in combating Islamic extremism and restoring the positive image of our country abroad."

With the end of the Cold War, adopting the happy view that America's foes were now few, Congress opted to make public diplomacy a lower priority. USIA programs were cut back, and the remnants and lingering personnel of the agency eventually subsumed under the State Department, whose professional diplomats are schooled not in public relations, but the art of close-to-the-chest, government-to-government negotiations. Public diplomacy has thus been deprived of a separate agency whose sole reason for being is to amplify the American story to publics around the world, using the latest communications technology and the skills of practitioners who live, breathe and dream the mission.

Recent comments

For all the Mormons in the house, there was a political adviser from...

IIE Again... | Aug. 21, 2008 at 3:38 p.m.

Working for the International Visitor Leadership Program under the...

IIE | Aug. 21, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.

Wow. Thomas sees so many stupid people out there. That means he must...

Lewt | July 23, 2008 at 9:26 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

TCU creams U.

Carder is still open!

Hugh Nibley's coded language

That may possibly be the perception, but it is not the reality. From Hugh...

Same old story for Jazz

The man has no other choice than to use Maynor and Mathews, and then...

Vanishing languages a 'tragedy'

Global warming, beaches disappearing, and now the loss of language? The real...

Miller put spotlight on diabetes

I hope people will listen to the messages. Speaking as one who has revised...

TCU 55, Utah 28

Hey UTES, Carder is still open!

Born of water and the spirit

@3:02pm, and necessity for baptism: As a Baptist, I do not deny that there...

Rimando Saves!

TCU creams U.

TCU is clearly the powerhouse of the MWC, indeed, perhaps of the nation....

Obama is conveniently out of the country when the AG announced the NY trial....

Advertisements
Advertisement