From Deseret News archives:

Pac-10 will snub BYU, Utah

Published: Monday, July 7, 2008 12:09 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Longtime commissioner of the Pac-10, Tom Hansen is leaving his post, and a new face will replace him. This has brought on a debate whether the Pac-10 will once again revisit the issue of expansion.

I've had several people ship me a well-researched speculative piece on Foxsports.com by Greg Welch, making a case that BYU and Utah present excellent candidacies for membership in the Pac-10. The story chronicles and compares Pac-10, BCS and non-BCS football and basketball attendance, athletic budgets, market rankings and rivalries. It spells it out pretty well.

Yes, BYU and Utah would make great members of the Pac-10. In fact, I'd bet my most prized material possession, my golf clubs, that Utah and BYU would be better Pac-10 programs than Washington State and Oregon State.

But if it happens, it won't be any time soon. Changing commissioners won't change a general philosophy in the Pac-10 that they've got the money and the TV exposure, a gob of money and others do not. And they're not sharing.

Simple as that.

Reading this piece by Welch, the quickest reaction I had is of a wayward premise that a new commissioner might matter.

A conference commissioner like Hansen, or even Karl Benson of the WAC or the MWC's Craig Thompson, do not make such decisions.

Story continues below
They carry out policies decided by university presidents.

They have a staff that studies issues and makes recommendations, but they do not decide. It's akin in politics to a city manager doing the bidding of a city council and mayor.

University presidents in the Pac-10 have no desire to expand. Their conference deploys a system where every team plays one another and a true champion is crowned. It has a train-load of money from an ABC-TV contract shared with the Big Ten until 2014.

The Pac-10 has the Rose Bowl, which is exempt from the $6 million fee other BCS bowls must pay to have the BCS label by its name. It keeps Rose Bowl money and BCS coin, and it's a league that isn't going to divide it with new kids on the block.

Imagine a president at USC or chancellor at Washington sitting in his living room during the holidays, turning on the TV to watch the Rose Bowl and seeing BYU or Utah as the Pac-10 representative.

Won't happen until gasoline is back to a buck a gallon or the left coast becomes one big, long beach.

So, an otherwise excellently researched piece with fascinating figures is more fodder for discussion than staple for an actual move that has a voice of flesh and bone. The Pac-10 is set.

Recent comments

The reason so many people don't want BYU is because they know they...

dont really care | Feb. 12, 2009 at 7:17 p.m.

I know the PAC 10 does not wnat to expand, but lets say in a few...

chris | Aug. 26, 2008 at 2:51 p.m.

In other news, Washington State football (916 in 2008) was penalized...

Academically Challenged | July 16, 2008 at 10:28 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Read the blogs, the guy was saying he was barely an athlete and could compete...

No, general education as found at a college or university is not offered at a...

I am absolutely amazed by my new Droid. I didn't know it would be the 5th...

@Promote the general welfare 11:48 a.m.: "Can I expect a check from you or...

This could be a dandy. Can't wait.

Chadders, now that you mention it, I've never heard any interview with Olave....

@Re;Bryce T. thanks for the laugh

What actions have been taken by the league and the universities?

UNM's Lambert should be punished by either suspension of several games...

UNR not UNM

Advertisements
Advertisement