From Deseret News archives:

GOP, Big Oil push shale in Utah

Critics say development would be costly, drain water supplies

Published: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 12:05 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Hatch, Bennett and the company officials Tuesday pointed to oil prices that have pushed past $140 per barrel and gas prices nationally that are above $4 a gallon and rising. Alternative fuel technologies, such as ethanol, aren't enough to ease everyone's short-term financial pain, they said.

James Bunger, an Department of Energy consultant and president of Energy Technology & Engineering, said that the United States needs to show the market that it is serious about supplying more of the country's domestic energy needs, which would have a "moderating effect" on prices. One speaker after another said the technology to develop shale and tar sands has improved and experiments on Utah's state lands have already shown the latest methods work well.

But environmentalists questioned whether costly oil-shale retrieval would bring a net economic benefit and warned of dangers to land and water resources and to archaeological treasures.

"I don't think we're ready to go after oil shale," said Steve Tanner, a member of the Nine Mile Canyon Coalition, who made his career in mining. "I think it takes more energy to develop it than it's going to yield. We don't have the water resources."

Citing one method of removal, Tanner said it would take more hot water than people think to heat up the oil enough to move it out of the rock. "There's no way to predict how much heat it's going to take to move it," he said in an interview Tuesday.

Story continues below
Hatch disagreed, saying Utah has enough water to aid in shale development, which he said doesn't require as much water as previously thought.

"We're fully capable of providing enough water to do that," Hatch said. "And we'd be stupid not to."

But Tanner said that mining tar sands with methods like those used in Canada would result in "total devastation" of the environment. "Everything that's left is dead," he said. Truck traffic needed to transport oil out of the Nine Mile Canyon area also threatens the fragile rock art there.

Getting oil from shale is a "pipe dream," Tanner said, and everyone, including Washington politicos, should focus on conservation and limiting the amount of petroleum-based products they use, he added.

Hatch acknowledged that shale and sands operations would affect the environment, but he said that companies would be required to reclaim areas they have impacted.


E-mail: sspeckman@desnews.com

Recent comments

We should have been drilling years ago and extracting the oil from...

Thomas | July 6, 2008 at 8:38 p.m.

Typical behavior in modern America: propose a solution (oil shale),...

G | July 6, 2008 at 8:20 p.m.

To totally off the grid, you must be talking about our President's...

Joes45acp | July 5, 2008 at 3:27 p.m.

Image

Sen. Bob Bennett, center, speaks at the state Capitol about oil-shale and tar-sands development.

previousnext

Latest comments

Here's a suggestion for the thief. Take art lessons and learn how to paint a...

Nfl is talking about adding to cap on Rookies.....this may be the last year...

Jazz fall apart late at L.A.

Sloan is irreplacable, greater than Jackson, greater leader, better person,...

Depleted uranium OK'd for storage

Energy Solutions won't be around 10,000 years from now. Neither will Herbert...

Let's see, you naysayers remember when you point a finger at someone you have...

BCS = power conference monopoly

Hey guys, I have an great idea. We can chose the national champion with a...

Re: waterslide...not the same thing at all. Waterslide use is not limited to...

Pitta hands down should have got it. It just continues to show the ridiculous...

Letters: Global warming a lie

Those darned thermometers and their liberal bias!

@I hope 6:56 Do you not see the hypocrisy in your won post?!?!? Astounding.

Advertisements