From Deseret News archives:

Utah lawmakers just pretend to care about safety of mine workers

Published: Monday, June 23, 2008 12:23 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Q: What's the difference between Utah's animal cruelty laws and mine safety laws?

A: Animal cruelty law calls for punishing offenders by making it a felony. But mine safety laws focus on responding to accidents by training mine workers and inspectors, rather than by prevention. There is no punishment for law-breaking mine operators.

If lawmakers had applied the same logic to animal cruelty as they do for mine safety, they would have called for educating animal trainers to teach animals how to protect themselves, create "first-responder programs" and build animal shelters and hospitals. And they might even have thrown in anger management for violators. Under the Coal Mine Safety Act (SB224), the state is responsible for promoting mine safety through training and coordination but not enforcement.

Story continues below
After the Crandall Canyon Mine disaster, there was a great public outcry and a commitment to prevent accidents from ever happening again. There were vigils, fundraisers and a call for studies to prevent such disasters. There was even a state commission created that was charged with reviewing the role of state government in assuring the safety of miners and "their families and communities" and making recommendations including legislative action. From the start, any recommendations for state responsibility seemed doomed to failure when one senator on the commission said the feds could handle it.

We know how that turned out. The commission came out with an extensive list of recommendations that amounted to "closing the barn door after the horse got out." They recommended training for miners and inspectors on how to respond to accidents but little to prevent accidents or penalties for mine owners who failed to comply with safety laws.

Something doesn't seem right when lawmakers extensively debate to make animal cruelty a felony rather than a misdemeanor but with barely a whisper pass a law that only calls for promoting safety for miners. What it shows is not so much the public sentiment about safety, rather the lack of moral courage of legislators who instead respond to lobbyists who represent special interests that keep them in office. We now see how mine owners have been able to deal with the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, besides lobbying, by stonewalling. Nationally, many mine owners/operators now automatically appeal 100 percent of MSHA safety citations. Crandall Canyon Mine owners/operators contested 271 of the 273 citations at its Utah mines from October 2007 through April 2008.

Recent comments

Thumbs up to Price. Union bosses have killed the unions. The workers...

Anonymous | June 24, 2008 at 4:35 p.m.

No where do I see "coal miner" or any affiliation with mines listed...

Price | June 23, 2008 at 10:56 p.m.

the only protection the miners had were Unions but they managed to...

jr | June 23, 2008 at 3:36 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

She's a babe alright. Don't see her posing for any of those girly magazines.

Good for them. Let's support their efforts and respectfully make our voices...

This man didn't even show up to his own 9/12 rallies. Beck is a fool...

Utah Utes whip SDSU

I have to say the rivalry game looks pretty good for next Saturday. Utah may...

Hatch, Bennett oppose health bill

It's good to see Bennett's/Hatch's true colors regarding health care in...

5A: Miners dig deep, claim crown

I have watched the game a couple of times now and can not find two of the...

They play Sunday night not tonight.

If you do not want gay marriage in temple, that is fine. However then,...

Broncos make Aggies pay

Respect your opponent. If you say he's inferior, and he beats you, what does...

Women athletes will never be on a par with men until they knife, pistol-whip,...

Advertisements