From Deseret News archives:

Districts statewide developing plans based on educator performance

Published: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:01 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Across the state, school districts are developing their own unique plans to distribute legislative funding based on how well educators are doing their jobs.

Many of the performance-based compensation plans are a mix of elements, such as test data and teacher assessments.

Some districts have plans that emphasize teamwork and collaboration.

"We want to give teachers a carrot, to pull them together — not apart," said Robert Proffit, Washington School District professional development coordinator.

The Legislature earmarked $20 million in one-time funding for the compensation plans. The money will be doled out to districts based on enrollment.

The districts must have their plans to the state Board of Education by July 1. Many districts are frustrated with the short time allotted but say they wouldn't want to pass up the funding opportunity.

Jordan and Granite school boards approved their plans Tuesday night.

Story continues below
Granite District's plan is two-fold. First, participating teachers must create goals for themselves and their students. Money will be distributed based on achievement of these goals. Second, a school that had high participation in the goal-setting then sets three goals for itself. This can be a mix of elements, such as improving attendance, test scores and grade point average.

Jordan District's plan is comprised of 30 percent performance evaluations; 30 percent U-PASS test scores; and 40 percent Indicators of School Quality. ISQ is a survey system the district implemented last spring. Schools are rated on categories such as parent support, teacher excellence and instructional quality.

Weber and Alpine school districts are continuing to work on their plans.

Weber District's plan will be site-based and is being developed by individual schools and specific Weber district departments.

Assessments may focus on both academic and nonacademic measures. Incentives will be based on achieving or exceeding goals related to the individual school performance or district department plans. Evaluation of performance can be measured based on learning tools and instructional quality, but can also include parent, student and faculty surveys. Distinguished practices, knowledge, skill levels, student growth and advanced training also will be considered.

At Weber District, the funds will be awarded based on entire groups achieving or exceeding the goals which they have established. If performance levels aren't reached, the entire school or district department won't be eligible.

Recent comments

I wouldn't waste my time with this. I teach because of the students,...

Steve | July 28, 2008 at 10:44 a.m.

...sounds good! I could an extra tank of gas ...which is all it...

I teach | July 21, 2008 at 6:09 p.m.

THIS IS THE WORST IDEA I HAVE HEARD IN YEARS!!! turn children into...

curt | June 24, 2008 at 10:28 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Common Opponents shows BYU posted an average of 16 points wins at 36-20....

Jim Burr, Do you have children who attend public school? Or have you? Do...

Does it matter who BYU plays in their bowl game? Realistically, it could be...

Letters: Global warming a plot

does that mean it really goes away?

Editorial: Food is not the enemy

Let's say, there is, (not are), a number of biological, psychological and...

Don't underestimate gratitude

I'm a little disappointed in this week's story. I think we have all grown...

To Bob-in-Line: So will the lawsuits ban fans from attending or watching...

BYU has to run the ball at least 40% of their plays with some success....

Editorial: Poor welcome for Palin

Palin is a VERY qualified politician. If you don't believe me, just look on...

Coach that will wear smedium clothing during the game. Smedium (for those who...

Advertisements