From Deseret News archives:

Texas fires back with photos in FLDS case

Lawyers say that female pictured with Jeffs is his 12-year-old wife

Published: Saturday, May 24, 2008 10:21 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Matassarin objected to the line of questioning by attorneys, making reference to the 3rd Court of Appeals decision vacating Judge Barbara Walther's order placing the children in state custody. She wondered what was the immediate or dire emergency that led the state to take custody of the Jessop's child.

Walther shot her down, saying she has been criticized for not providing enough evidence.

"We're going to have a full blown adversarial hearing and if it takes two or three days, we'll do it," the judge said.

As they walked down the courthouse steps toward a crush of cameras and reporters, Louisa Bradshaw lifted the baby blanket to reveal the newborn son she was cradling in her arms to a few reporters. He was asleep, sucking on a pacifier.

Jessop said it was only the second time he has seen his son since the baby was born. As he spoke to reporters, a CPS worker interrupted him.

"We need to take her," the woman said, trying to remove his arm which was wrapped around his wife.

"I'll walk with her," he said.

"We have to go," the worker said, prodding them toward the street. "Come on, let's go."

The couple walked toward an SUV, where Bradshaw was loaded in the back seat and her baby was placed in a carseat next to her. Jessop reached in and hugged his wife.

"It's rough to be separated from your family over and over again," he said.


Story continues below
E-mail: bwinslow@desnews.com

Recent comments

The point you people seem to be missing is it doesn't matter how old...

Worried: | Aug. 18, 2008 at 12:19 p.m.

Warren Jeffs should be hung. The damage he has done will not stop...

Anonymous | June 6, 2008 at 3:52 p.m.

A right and we don't say it's "ok" in our general society for these...

Two wrongs don't make | June 3, 2008 at 9:26 a.m.

Image

Photos of FLDS Church leader Warren Jeffs and a young female were entered into evidence in a custody battle over a 1-week-old baby. Lawyers would not say where they obtained the photos, which are dated July 2006.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements