Measure seeks to change Utah's discrimination law

Published: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:34 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Shanti Akayla says she was a highly praised employee at her sales job — until someone saw her rainbow bumper sticker. Then, she was fired.

"I was not out at work, I was not dating," Akayla, 39, told a legislative panel Wednesday. "My employer made an assumption about me because of a bumper sticker ... I had never been fired and I haven't been since."

Akayla had no legal recourse, because, in Utah, employment discrimination law doesn't extend protections based on sexual orientation or gender identity. That's something that Akayla would like to see changed.

"I truly believe someday this will be law. We are a very fair state," said Akayla shortly after testifying in favor of legislation to add sexual orientation and gender identity to a list of protected employment classes that encompasses characteristics such as religion, sex and race.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Christine Johnson, D-Salt Lake, was sent to interim study during the past legislative session. The Interim Business and Labor Committee again considered the idea during nearly two-hours of wide-ranging discussion, but took no action.

There have been 495 complaints filed with the Labor Commission since last June. Since that time, 30 people have reported discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. Of those, only two complaints could be filed — under other categories — one religion and one disability.

Story continues below

"If one is working in Utah, one should be judged solely on one's work performance," Johnson told committee members. "You can be fired for being gay ... or even saying 'fabulous' too much."

Questions arose during the hearing as to definitions and perceptions of what would be covered under the law. Rep. Stephen Clark, R-Provo, questioned how gender identity would be defined, and wondered whether a medical certificate would be required to prove an individual is transgender. The discussion also turned to potential cultural and economic impacts.

Monica Whalen, president of the Employers Council, spoke against the bill, saying it would hurt employers by adding to the "list of grounds upon which they can be attacked and have their management style second-guessed." And she said, the addition could open the door for further groups, such as young, single adults who may see family leave as discriminatory.

"There is no next. This is the group that is not protected, that has not been protected for years and years and years," said Rep. Jackie Biskupski, D-Salt Lake. "It is time to add them to the list."

Harris Sondak, business professor at the University of Utah, said the change would help to dispel Utah's image of close-mindedness and help attract economic development. He pointed to a "Bohemian index" which shows a correlation between creative and high-tech communities.

Recent comments

An easy solution is to repeal the states Right to Work law that...

Bob G | May 22, 2008 at 5:57 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

are to get the CANCER (Boozer) out of the locker room; make cap space to keep...

Hey Thomas Portland is giving up cap space for the Jazz. So another way to...

of her decisions that were appealed to the Supreme court were overturned. ...

20 Utah law profs back Sotomayor

Sotomayor has had only 3 out 11 of her cases heard by the Supreme Court being...

Some of you are missing the point! Yes... the Jazz only get Thomas and his...

Unholy alliance

"We don't need another law to force politicians to act with integrity" says...

Firms want health reform

Using government advantage is best for everybody. Nobody can collect the...

If the people of southern utah had documented and cataloged what they found,...

to resolve Millsap's contract first, one way or the other. Is this a...

can afford to go on tour, then why not have a family member travel with you...

Advertisements