From Deseret News archives:

Ellsberg denounces lies of Vietnam, Iraq wars

The whistleblower compares deeds of LBJ, Nixon, Bush

Published: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:45 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Daniel Ellsberg, the man famous for leaking the top-secret "Pentagon Papers" to the New York Times and Washington Post in 1971, delivered the keynote address Thursday at an event celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Utah chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. The gathering was in the Sheraton City Center.

Ellsberg revisited his whistle-blowing — the 7,000-page document he shared with the media detailed U.S. policy and military escalation in southeast Asia from 1945 to 1968 — in a presentation that drew parallels with the conduct of Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon during the conflict and President George W. Bush's policies and decisionmaking in the current war in Iraq.

Ellsberg noted that some of the most critical information to which he was privy discounted the very act that precipitated the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" passed by the U.S. Congress in 1964, widely considered the official start of the war in Vietnam.

Ellsberg knew that the supposed attack of Aug. 4, 1964, on U.S. naval vessels in international waters did not occur, and he correlated that false report with statements made by Bush administration officials about Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction in the days leading to the U.S. invasion of that country.

Story continues below
"This administration has blatantly ... broken grave laws over and over and continues to do it," Ellsberg said. "They're not the first to do that. I worked for a president, Lyndon Johnson, who lied us into a war as egregiously as we were lied into the Iraq war. I knew the night of the alleged attack on our destroyers in the Tonkin Gulf."

Ellsberg said that many of the government activities carried out covertly in the late '60s and early '70s — wiretapping, illegal detention, attempts to control press access — are currently sanctioned by provisions of the Patriot Act. These new powers granted to the country's executive branch, combined with what Ellsberg described as a declaration of war without congressional approval, bears more resemblance to a monarchy than a republic, he said. This, said Ellsberg, diverges far from the intent of the U.S. Founding Fathers.

"The power to start a war on his own initiative was the attribute of kingship that our founders most wanted to deny to the new president," Ellsberg said. "The theory of that constitution is that no one man could make that decision."

Recent comments

God Bless Daniel Ellsberg.

tjtibbs | May 10, 2008 at 8:52 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

RSL's Rimando makes 3

Not good at crosses Too short Too unreliable right... Did anyone...

TCU creams U.

for later. after the rivalry game then we can say we know who is better....

RSL's Rimando makes 3

So Great!!! So Proud - Love RSL - Bring Home The CUP!!!!!

mr cannon's bold assertation that the purpose of the first ammendemnt as...

RSL heads to MLS title game

Great great great game!!!! Nicky Rimando is a god! We're the most complete...

I had the game on DVR and just watched it. That was the most exciting game...

RSL heads to MLS title game

financially cannot this year, but I will watch loyally, how great to hear...

This is hardly surprising. Bennett has a remarkable arrogance which is also...

RSL heads to MLS title game

I guess that is why "they play the game" as Herman Edwards would say.. ...

BYU happy to escape with victory

What was the score of the LSU vs LA tech game? Alot closer than you'd like to...

Advertisements
Advertisement