From Deseret News archives:

Budget talks inaudible in West Jordan

3-hour meeting quiet, especially City Council

Published: Wednesday, May 7, 2008 12:16 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WEST JORDAN — Cities' residents mostly don't show an interest in their governments' budget process until the city has already scheduled a hearing to raise taxes.

Except in West Jordan.

Here, residents sat through last Tuesday's three-hour City Council work session about the proposed 2008-09 budget — unable to hear what was being said — just to watch their city leaders quietly deliberate raising property taxes by at least $2 million. Even from the front row, details like whether city employees should receive a cost-of-living increase or residents should pay for street lights were impossible to hear without a microphone.

And there purposely weren't any microphones.

"When we sit up on the dais and we put mikes out there, it becomes a different atmosphere than when we can just chat and go back and forth and be less formal," Mayor Dave Newton said. "Certainly we don't want to stop the public from viewing what was going on, but that wasn't the most important part of this (meeting), in my opinion. The most important thing was for the council to discuss and weigh these decisions, because these decisions aren't easy, and it's hard when you've got an audience to do that."

Story continues below
The City Council normally doesn't use microphones during work sessions, but when fewer people attend the meeting, it's possible for residents to join the council at its table to hear better, Newton said. In this case, with so many people in attendance, that wasn't possible. Even a recording of the meeting, which was posted on the city's Web site the next day, was equally inaudible in parts.

Newton says, in retrospect, he might have done things differently. The budget is creating enough stir in the city to prompt an unofficially formed group of about 40 residents to meet twice a week — including on Saturday mornings at 7:30 a.m. — just to slog through several 6-inch binders that are the city budget. Newton says he values the group's input — several of the group's suggested budget cuts have already been implemented by the City Council — and he doesn't want to discourage public participation.

The Open and Public Meetings Act doesn't specify that amplification must be used in public meetings in order for city councils to "conduct their deliberations openly," but allowing the public to hear council discussions is an important part of inviting public participation and an assumed component of an "open" meeting, says Tim Smith, a Salt Lake attorney who specializes in the open meetings act.

Recent comments

Hey, sunshine, sue them for what? The meeting was open. People...

SoSueMe | May 8, 2008 at 9:15 a.m.

One issue is the timeing the budget is presented to the council, and...

WJ Resident & Business Owner | May 7, 2008 at 9:41 a.m.

Under Utah's Open Meetings Act, the city council's deliberations (not...

sunshine | May 7, 2008 at 8:40 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

No, students are NOT safe from predators. If a parent wants to make sure...

If you really think Mormon's are mainstream, you must not have paid attention...

I don't see the schools presidents voting to get rid of WYM or NM, even...

Big games keep UHSAA coffers full

why people complain about how football is covered by the media too much. when...

A little perspective is not a bad thing. Notice the Cougar's won loss record...

I actually was encouraged by some aspects of the game. Any Utah fan who has...

A story about Mormons as minorities? In this paper? Get over the "victim"...

she was an awesome woman someone i looked up to when i was younger she was...

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

Wow you just made one of the dumbest comments I've heard yet. Fire Bronco????...

Photos: A Royal welcome home

Re: Huh?, You like many other haters are probably oblivious to many obvious...

Advertisements
Advertisement