Foes of education bill defend planned battle

Coalition suspects 'will of the people' is ignored

Published: Saturday, May 3, 2008 12:19 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A volunteer attorney for the group planning to file a lawsuit over the education omnibus bill said said the group is a coalition of plaintiffs who are concerned about how the Legislature conducts the people's business and not about ax-grinding in an election year.

Plaintiffs on the lawsuit, which will most likely be filed in the next three weeks, are a bi-partisan group of "legislators, former legislators, education community officials and public citizens who are very concerned about an open and fair legislative process," said Alan Smith, an attorney for the group.

Recently legislative leadership called the suit "grandstanding in an election year."

"I haven't heard anyone say 'we don't like (Speaker of the House Greg Curtis, R-Sandy), we want to get him in the next election cycle,' — a lot of them are Republicans that are concerned in the matter of ethics and fair process," Smith said.

"I think they are representative of a feeling that has been growing in Utah in the last few years that perhaps the legislative leadership in the Senate and House is not as sensitive as it ought to be to the will of the people," he said.

Story continues below
At issue is the controversial omnibus bill, SB2, which rolled a dozen school bills, some of which had been voted down earlier in the session, into the schools' $2.5 million budget, known as the Minimum School Programs Act.

Some lawmakers and other officials were opposed to rolling a number of bills into one and questioned its constitutionality. Others took issue with reviving unpopular bills that were previously voted down by lawmakers and strapping them to more popular bills, thus giving them a "free ride."

"You have legislative leadership that says 'we don't care what the majority says,"' Smith said. "It's this anti-majoritarian, arrogant, we-know-better kind of attitude, and then manipulation to boot, that just shouldn't be."

But proponents of the bill said the Legislature was well within its bounds in bundling the bills.

The Utah Constitution prohibits "logrolling" unconnected bills into one unless they are bound by a single subject. Senate Majority Leader Curt Bramble, R-Provo, told the Deseret News this week that the subject of SB2 was education. And the practice of bundling related bills is not uncommon.

But others don't buy it.

"If you look at it superficially, then you could say 'well this is a single subject, it's education,"' Smith said. "But if you wanted to trade jabs at that superficial level, word omnibus itself means something other than a singular subject."

Smith also said that the argument that passing bundled bills is not uncommon doesn't excuse the practice.

"I know men who cheat on their wives — a lot — but it's still adultery. We don't amend constitutions by violating them," Smith said.


E-mail: terickson@desnews.com

Recent comments

Successfully.

Plaintiff | May 6, 2008 at 7:17 p.m.

This is not the first time an Omnibus bill has been used to pass...

Plaintiff | May 6, 2008 at 7:15 p.m.

This is a clear attempt to ingnore the rights of voters. The bill...

OHH | May 5, 2008 at 3:19 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

where do you meet?

anyone who wants this girl to share "any" of the blame are wrongheaded and...

Yep--just when you thought it couldn't get any more ridiculous, a couple of...

Thanks Bill for helping to stop this genocide and getting other nations...

So easy for those with no standards to cry and whine about those with them....

I seem to recall a black woman who once was asked politely to give up her...

What the Jazz need to do is trade all the players and fold. These guys are...

Its time to let Paul go and be over paid for a back up roll. Thats all he...

What if something like this happened to YOUR child?

It seems to be that people are forgetting who coached one of the best power...

Advertisements