From Deseret News archives:

Per capita ranking OK, officials say

Published: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:46 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The federal government spent less per person in Utah than in almost any other state in 2006, according to a new census report.

Only Nevada ranked lower than the $6,162 per capita spent in Utah, according to the "Consolidated Federal Funds Report: 2006," released Wednesday by the U.S. Census Bureau.

When it comes to total federal funds, California got the biggest share — 10.3 percent of the $2.45 trillion the federal government spent domestically in 2006. The spending marks a 7.5 percent boost nationwide over 2005.

Utah received $15.7 billion — less than 1 percent of the total.

States at the top end of the report's per capita spending received more than double the amount spent in Utah.

However, state economist Juliette Tennert said the reason for Utah's shortfall isn't necessarily the state not getting its fair share. She points out that the top two states, Louisiana and Mississippi, received $16,263 and $14,516 per capita, respectively. Both of them, however, were recovering from Hurricane Katrina in 2006, and likely received large amounts of federal relief in its aftermath.

Another example was Alaska, which has a relatively small population that inflates the per capita amount.

Story continues below
Plus, she said, Utah doesn't have large numbers of the types of individuals who receive the funding.

"We don't have a lot of federal employees in Utah, and some of those government programs, relative to the rest of the nation," she said. "Utah doesn't have high participation in TANIF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), Medicare or Medicaid."

Nearly half of all domestic spending — $1.16 trillion — went to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, according to the census report. And some $739 billion went to retirement and disability.

Utah, which has long been the nation's youngest state, doesn't receive as much federal funding in those areas as some other states, Tennert said.

"We have a lot of kids relative to adults," she said. "We're very young ... Because of our unique population, even though we are low, we are getting our fair share."

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said in a statement that the per capita numbers are no surprise given Utah's demographics as "a young population with many children and young families, people who live healthy lifestyles and are self-reliant and a very vibrant economy."

Hatch suggested that a better measure would show Utah's federal funding in areas such as transportation, defense spending and government contracting.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Why does it matter what others say? Why do you even listen to them? If...

Whatever Max Hall said about the U of U, it will haunt him for a long time...

2 citations issued at Y.-U. game

The aggies are out in the cold and you hate the only two football teams in...

Ranks of uninsured Utahns to swell

This article isn't accurate. It says COBRA would go away under health care...

I am the happiest I've ever been. I love my family, my job, the gospel....

I watched the game...bottom line, both teams played poorly. Utah beat...

If you cover your eyes no one can see you. Of course the Glass is half full...

What else is new? I believe if we took a further Poll to show how Utah as a...

Jazz win 6th in 7 games

knows how to beat PHO. The Jazz should study the game film from PHO/NY. They...

Find joy in life, Bishop Burton says

I agree with Bishop Burton. And to those cynics who complain about what they...

Advertisements