Genetics may affect ability to quit smoking and cancer risk

Published: Thursday, April 3, 2008 12:25 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Scientists have pinpointed genetic variations that make people more likely to get hooked on cigarettes and more prone to develop lung cancer — a finding that could someday lead to screening tests and customized treatments for smokers trying to kick the habit.

The discovery by three separate teams of scientists makes the strongest case so far for the biological underpinnings of nicotine addiction and sheds more light on how genetics and lifestyle habits join forces to cause cancer.

"This is kind of a double-whammy gene," said Christopher Amos, a professor of epidemiology at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and author of one of the studies. "It also makes you more likely to be dependent on smoking and less likely to quit smoking."

A smoker who inherits these genetic variations from both parents has an 80 percent greater chance of lung cancer than a smoker without the variants, the researchers reported. And that same smoker on average lights up two extra cigarettes a day and has a much harder time quitting than smokers who don't have these genetic differences.

The researchers disagreed on whether the variants directly increased the risk of lung cancer or did so indirectly, by causing more smoking.

Story continues below

The three studies, funded by governments in the U.S. and Europe, are being published today in the journals Nature and Nature Genetics.

The scientists studied the genes of more than 35,000 white people of European descent in Europe, Canada and the U.S. Blacks and Asians will be studied soon and may yield different results, scientists said.

They aren't quite sure if what they found is a set of variations in one gene or in three closely connected genes.

The gene variations, which govern nicotine receptors on cells, could eventually help explain some of the mysteries of chain smoking, nicotine addiction and lung cancer. These oddities include why there are 90-year-old smokers who don't get cancer and people who light up an occasional cigarette and don't get hooked.

"This is really telling us that the vulnerability to smoking and how much you smoke is clearly biologically based," said psychiatry professor Dr. Laura Bierut of Washington University in St. Louis, a genetics and smoking expert who did not take part in the studies. She praised the research as "very intriguing."

The smoking rate among U.S. adults has dropped from 42 percent in 1965 to less than 21 percent now.

The new studies are surprising in that they point to areas of the genetic code that are not associated with pleasure and the rewards of addiction.

That may help explain why some people can quit and others fail, said Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse in Bethesda, Md., which funded one of the studies.

Recent comments

If you never smoke that first cigarette, then you will never know if...

duh! | April 3, 2008 at 5:51 p.m.

This is just one more reason to NEVER smoke that first cigarette.

awh | April 3, 2008 at 3:05 p.m.

Of course genetics play a role. If your parents were morons and...

Me | April 3, 2008 at 9:32 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Mormon myths mostly harmless but unnecessary

Whereas many of the "faith-promoting" stories that circulate in Mormon...

Thanks for the clarification. (For the record, I knew you weren't a full-time...

REgardless if anyone lied, if in actuality there were any lies, Obama,...

The BCS is accused, fairly, of at least two things: 1. Keeping the title...

Earmarks unbridled

The federal government has stolen most Utah's lands, shouldn't Utah get...

Loyalties have changed

For those of you that favor immigration, there are six and a half billion...

Mormon myths mostly harmless but unnecessary

"U of U Student | 11:24 a.m. July 10, 2009 How about this current modern...

Farming for the needy

This was a very accurate article. We ought to know. Credit was fairly given...

Stop celebrity coverage

It's NOT about what the people want, it's about what makes the media money.

The whole business of retiring a flag by burning it is superstitiousness at...

Advertisements