From Deseret News archives:

Case focuses on Utah emergency-driving law

Published: Friday, March 21, 2008 1:33 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WEST JORDAN — A motion filed by the defense in the case of a Taylorsville police officer charged with negligent homicide raises the question of whether any law enforcer, firefighter or ambulance driver who responds to an emergency in Utah is actually protected by state law when he or she engages in emergency driving.

The trial for Joseph Corbett has once again been continued after new motions were filed by both the prosecution and defense.

Defense attorney Ed Brass filed a motion to have the case dismissed and another to bar a witness for the state from testifying.

The state filed its own motion to have the trial continued and said it anticipated filing another motion soon to restrict information regarding texting on the part of the victim from being presented during trial.

Corbett was responding to assist other officers involved in a chase on Feb. 7, 2007, about 12:40 a.m. At the intersection of 4700 South Redwood Road he crashed into another vehicle driven by 27-year-old John Douglas of Tooele who was killed.

The defense says Corbett was traveling with his lights and siren on, that he had a green light, that Douglas was driving with the painkiller Tramadol in his system and was text-messaging while driving.

Prosecutors contend the light for Corbett was red and he did not properly "clear" the intersection the way all law enforcers are expected.

Story continues below
One of the key elements of the case has been the argument of department policy versus state rule or law. The defense has argued, and 3rd District Judge Robert Adkins has so far agreed, that a police department's own policy does not meet the same standard as state law.

Now, Brass said after looking again at the Utah Code, there may be a problem with the entire emergency vehicle operation rule for all law enforcement agencies.

"It's not a loophole, it's a failure," he said.

According to the statute that outlines the rules for emergency driving and exempts police officers, firefighters and ambulance drivers from following regular highway rules, lights and sirens must be used, the driver must abide by departmental policy and that policy has to conform with the rule established by the Department of Public Safety.

"The Department of Public Safety shall make rules providing minimum standards for all emergency pursuit policies that are adopted by public agencies authorized to operate emergency pursuit vehicles," according to 41-6a-212.

For negligent homicide to be proven, Brass said there must be a gross deviation from the standard. The problem, according to Brass, is that no standard has been put on the rule book yet.

Recent comments

Dan is correct. Quite often, a dispatcher will relay information...

Fish | May 20, 2008 at 9:10 p.m.

Catherine.....here's a news flash for you...police cars have...

Dan | May 20, 2008 at 1:04 a.m.

TO DES NEWS:

Stop blocking my comments! You are so biased it's not...

Catherine | March 21, 2008 at 10:22 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

I'd like to rate the state legislators. FAIL!

The NRA is a special interest group.

I don't have a dog in this fight, other than I always wanted to be a teacher...

Editorial: Air standards changing

SUV = 8 mpg vs. Toyota Prius = 51 mpg Honda civic = 45 mpg Ford Fusion =...

New storms threaten SoCal towns

Yes been there lived there The rains of erosion has Damaged the areas~

To Anonymous: Fast and pray and pay your tithing and everything will be OK...

Newborn blood tests stirring debate

One Texas couple don't want the tests? Let them opt out, reminding them they...

'...several gay soldiers I know, overwhelmingly OPPOSE repeal of DADT...' -...

Step one: Stop listening to butters' moronic statements. Step two: Stop...

Dow closes below 10,000

Well obviously Earl, if you are against inflated markets, you must be against...

Advertisements