Getting oil from sands and shale too destructive for some

Published: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:51 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
With $100-per-barrel oil prices, talks of finding and extracting the black gold wherever it can be found in Utah and elsewhere is raising radars for environmental groups.

Even though any large-scale tar sands and oil shale development in Utah might be years away, the Nine Mile Canyon Coalition already fears that oil projects in the proposed Argyle Canyon Special Tar Sands Areas would "leave vast areas of land sterile and ugly, use more water than is readily available in this arid region and would pollute both ground and surface water for many miles downstream."

The public comment period for the so-called Tar Sands/Oil Shale Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) ends Thursday. This part of the process is being used only to identify where leasing government-owned land for sands and shale development might take place.

"I don't believe there's any way they can do it without total devastation," said Steve Tanner, chairman of Nine Mile Canyon's impact research committee.

Tanner grew up around mines and worked in the industry as a career. "I've seen the good, the bad and the ugly," he said. "There's ways of doing things correctly."

Story continues below

For Tanner, the closest method to his version of correct for tar sands and oil shale would still mean having to drill way too many holes and pumping hot water down them to release the trapped oil and then bring the product back to the surface. He said there isn't enough available water for that. There are also questions about removing mountain tops to get at it and where to store the leftover materials.

"That's total destruction," Tanner said.

Once a final environmental assessment is published, the Interior Secretary will meet with governors from Utah, Colorado and Wyoming to talk about whether there is sufficient interest and justification for moving forward with a leasing program, said Jim Kohler, chief of minerals for the BLM in Utah. He said rules would still need to be established that will govern leasing government land to drilling operations.

Kohler said predicting what environmental impacts may happen is premature.

"Until you have a specific proposal in front of you ... it's pretty hard to say what that development will look like," he said. Once a proposal to lease land for oil shale or tar sands development is brought forward, there will be another public comment period to consider details of the proposal.

In addition to the Nine Mile Canyon Coalition's early concerns over Argyle Canyon, the group stated this week that vast areas of Nine Mile Canyon are being proposed for tar sands leases. A Coalition statement depicted a worst case scenario in which part of the Nine Mile area will one day resemble Kennecott's Bingham copper mine operations, which is easily seen on the west side of the Salt Lake Valley.

Recent comments

The spent shale from oil shale does not constitute haz waste. Because...

Charles London | March 21, 2008 at 10:42 a.m.

huuuhuuhuhhh

Anonymous | March 21, 2008 at 8:29 a.m.

Great comment about rearranging the overburden to recreate a mountain...

Montana | March 20, 2008 at 12:13 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

The Church is just so true. Can't these people see that?

Have all the homosexuals with overt hate agendas moved west?

Yes, I can honestly say i've never violated the trust of parents that put...

Rather than an easement why don't we respect the property rights of others...

You've blamed the girl You've blamed pornography. Why don't you put the...

Questions to ask: 1) Crunch time, can feed the ball to Millsap in the post...

To force the issue and then make a huge thing out of a little confromtation....

The problem with a lot of homosexuals kissing in public is that it makes...

"I'm sorry, but heroes should be at minimum a good family man, and I'm not...

Hey, my family is full of love and would like to use your back yard for our...

Advertisements