From Deseret News archives:

Mapleton tiff on land won't go to voters

Judge says city's action not subject to referendum

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2008 12:28 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — A court ruling will allow a Mapleton man to take a huge step in an "uphill battle" to develop his property on Maple Mountain, but the dispute isn't over just yet.

In a trial that pitted Mapleton residents against elected city officials, 4th District Judge Darold McDade ruled last Friday the decision to rezone Wendell A. Gibby's 120-acre property won't be turned over to voters for a referendum. Based on findings examined over a five-day bench trial, McDade stated, "the newly enacted zoning change constitutes an administrative change and is therefore not subject to referendum."

Jim Lundberg, a Mapleton resident who led the call for a referendum, said he's disappointed with McDade's decision because it would be in the city's best interests to let citizens give a thumbs up or down on the new zoning ordinance.

"At least, whatever the outcome, they would have had an opportunity to have a voice in the matter," he said.

The dispute came before the court after local residents and Mapleton city officials disagreed over whether voters should get a say on the move to upgrade Gibby's property at 2000 E. Dogwood Drive from critical environment zone to a planned development on which 47 single-family residential units could be built.

Story continues below
In September 2007, Friends of Maple Mountain Inc. gathered a petition with more than 1,100 signatures requesting a referendum, but city officials disregarded their behest, calling the rezone an administrative act. The group responded Oct. 15 by obtaining a temporary restraining order, blocking any City Council action on the rezone until a judge ruled.

Lundberg said his group is still uncertain whether they will appeal McDade's ruling. Anthony Scofield, the group's attorney, said they will have to decide soon because the deadline for appeal ends 30 days after a court order is filed.

Though an appeal has not yet been filed, other unresolved issues could stall the rezone.

Gibby and Mapleton have sparred for nearly six years over issues ranging from civil rights to eminent domain. To avoid litigation, the parties entered a memorandum of understanding May 15, 2007, in which both agreed to several terms, including a rezone of Gibby's property to allow development of 47 units.

Gibby said the court case between Mapleton and Friends of Maple Mountain has delayed development and cost him a substantial amount of money. Now he wants 13 more units.

"I think that's a fairly generous offer to the city," he said.

Recent comments

before Mr. "entitled" Mike Morley begins construction on a beautiful...

It' s only a matter of time | Feb. 26, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.

The sponsor of the Bill was Mike Morley. Not who you were thinking...

Just a Guy | Feb. 26, 2008 at 9:49 a.m.

you can't let voters get in the way of the good ol' boys profit....

Sweet William | Feb. 26, 2008 at 8:48 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

You are so smart - good job. Max loves you. Quest for Perfection.

Congrats to USU! Clearly the best team in the state right now. I am a...

Editorial: The case for Afghanistan

For once I wish people would actually hear what he said instead of getting...

Good thing the press release says visit the site for a full movie listing yet...

Aggies shoot past Cougars

Why do we even Play BYU...Automatic W at home for past 15 yrs....We need to...

It's not about winning and losing. It's about the all important 3-point...

Hey WoW, still think the Aggies should will be dropping a division and...

Aggies shoot past Cougars

Don't you mean the only good thing to come out of provo is Tai and Stew??...

Ice cores put the CO2 concentration during the "Medieval Warm Period" at...

I don't know MoJules. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that...

Advertisements