Mapleton tiff on land won't go to voters

Judge says city's action not subject to referendum

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2008 12:28 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — A court ruling will allow a Mapleton man to take a huge step in an "uphill battle" to develop his property on Maple Mountain, but the dispute isn't over just yet.

In a trial that pitted Mapleton residents against elected city officials, 4th District Judge Darold McDade ruled last Friday the decision to rezone Wendell A. Gibby's 120-acre property won't be turned over to voters for a referendum. Based on findings examined over a five-day bench trial, McDade stated, "the newly enacted zoning change constitutes an administrative change and is therefore not subject to referendum."

Jim Lundberg, a Mapleton resident who led the call for a referendum, said he's disappointed with McDade's decision because it would be in the city's best interests to let citizens give a thumbs up or down on the new zoning ordinance.

"At least, whatever the outcome, they would have had an opportunity to have a voice in the matter," he said.

The dispute came before the court after local residents and Mapleton city officials disagreed over whether voters should get a say on the move to upgrade Gibby's property at 2000 E. Dogwood Drive from critical environment zone to a planned development on which 47 single-family residential units could be built.

Story continues below

In September 2007, Friends of Maple Mountain Inc. gathered a petition with more than 1,100 signatures requesting a referendum, but city officials disregarded their behest, calling the rezone an administrative act. The group responded Oct. 15 by obtaining a temporary restraining order, blocking any City Council action on the rezone until a judge ruled.

Lundberg said his group is still uncertain whether they will appeal McDade's ruling. Anthony Scofield, the group's attorney, said they will have to decide soon because the deadline for appeal ends 30 days after a court order is filed.

Though an appeal has not yet been filed, other unresolved issues could stall the rezone.

Gibby and Mapleton have sparred for nearly six years over issues ranging from civil rights to eminent domain. To avoid litigation, the parties entered a memorandum of understanding May 15, 2007, in which both agreed to several terms, including a rezone of Gibby's property to allow development of 47 units.

Gibby said the court case between Mapleton and Friends of Maple Mountain has delayed development and cost him a substantial amount of money. Now he wants 13 more units.

"I think that's a fairly generous offer to the city," he said.

Gibby's attorney, Dayle Jeffs, said the city has not lived up to its part of the bargain. As part of the MOU, the city promised to grant permits to move power lines that run through Gibby's land — and that hasn't happened, he said.

Recent comments

before Mr. "entitled" Mike Morley begins construction on a beautiful...

It' s only a matter of time | Feb. 26, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.

The sponsor of the Bill was Mike Morley. Not who you were thinking...

Just a Guy | Feb. 26, 2008 at 9:49 a.m.

you can't let voters get in the way of the good ol' boys profit....

Sweet William | Feb. 26, 2008 at 8:48 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

the title could use some sense review. Instead of "beat people up", why not...

Machines to do court reporting

I'd like to ask a general question to any of you that might know. Have you...

“Cap and trade is free market oriented. When an efficient company sells...

NBA reported agreements

THis is the first sensible comment I have read. My hope is that a trade like...

Anonymous | 9:34 p.m I endured the Nixon recession that carried over into...

We've got plenty of options available to us. I still think some sort of trade...

I filled up my watter several times. Drinking fountain was on at my end.

Actually, the Spurs signed Richard Jefferson, not Al Jefferson.

Those who forget Teddy Roosevelt's words about walking softly and carrying a...

Don't forget that in an article last week Sloan (I think) said that they like...

Advertisements