Charter school funding bill voted down by House

Published: Monday, Feb. 25, 2008 5:44 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A bill that would place some of the burden of funding charter schools back on the school districts failed the clear the House Monday.

HB278 thrilled neither charter schools nor traditional district schools but bill sponsor Rep. Ron Bigelow, R-West Valley said it was the most reasonable way to deal with funding the states swiftly growing charter schools.

Last summer Bigelow met with both sides of the issue — charters and school districts. And though both sides would be losing money he said most agreed that it was probably the best approach.

A 2006 audit of Utah charter schools recommended state leaders use the interim to take a look at how to improve charter funding while addressing a funding disparity between charter schools and traditional public schools.

In the 2007 legislative session that recommendation was made, and a committee, made up of charter school leaders, legislators and district chiefs, has been meeting for the past seven months.

HB278 would require school districts to provide an allocation of property tax revenues for each resident student attending a charter school — meaning the student's home-district funding would follow him to whatever school he chose to attend, even if it is located outside the district.

Story continues below

But since the bill failed to pass the House some charter leaders say legislators could likely appropriate local replacement funding once again to fund charters next year — if the measure is not brought back to the House floor.

Since 2004 charters have received local replacement money from the state in lieu of property taxes because, unlike school districts, charters do not have taxing authority. So the state kicks in that additional funding.

However, the bill would have required charter schools to go back to receiving their funding from school districts, something they were required to do before 2004. Some charter leaders say the old process tended to create an adversarial relationship between charters and school districts, and some fear those feelings will resurface.

But Bigelow claimed that since the money allocations would be done through the state office, charters would not be harmed by bad blood with the school districts.


E-mail: terickson@desnews.com

Recent comments

I teach Special Ed. at a charter school where I serve over 33% of the...

SPED Teacher | Feb. 26, 2008 at 11:15 a.m.

Charter schools are schools of parental choice. They are required to...

Charter School Director | Feb. 26, 2008 at 11:03 a.m.

Guess what my wife teaches special ed and has had 3 students this...

realisitic | Feb. 26, 2008 at 9:09 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Palin not a point guard

Yeah it a lot better to give some crazy marxist/communist nut with a MESSIAH...

The body is not a prison

If anyone says its a halfway house, I'll scream.

Palin mistreated

There is more than one Can of spammed HAM on this blog. I'm for Palin, and...

Jackson memorial performers announced as L.A. braces

Irony so thick...

What happened to Luis Miguel Escalada?

Return to original

What does the 10th admendment say? Your ignorance is showing.

That is one way to get rid of Chaffetz. Good riddance, I say.

I remember when the GSL ran along I-5. Legacy Highway today would have been...

As a support ridder you usually are infront of the team leader working for...

Star Wars:The Original Trilogy would rock in 3D! It is cool to see great...

Advertisements