Partner registry under fire

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2008 12:09 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Lawmakers are considering whether Salt Lake City's newly approved domestic partner registry is simply a means toward health benefits or part of a national conspiracy to erode the meaning of marriage.

The Senate Health and Human Services Committee on Monday voted 4-0 to let the full Senate consider the matter.

"My motive is to provide good benefits to the city's employees and to our residents," said Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker of the registry, which recently received unanimous support from the Salt Lake City Council. It gives companies who choose to provide domestic partner benefits an easy way to verify such relationships and provides the right to hospital visitation.

But Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, says he's sponsoring SB267 to overrule Salt Lake City because he sees the registry as "an open checkbook" to future benefits that "mimics Utah's marriage recognition policy to a T."

Whether that registry violates the state's marriage policy was a key point discussed Monday, as lawmakers heard from Salt Lake's attorney that the registry is not even close to "substantially similar to marriage."

However, former state Rep. LaVar Christensen, who sponsored the marriage policy in 2004 with Buttars, said "if they have a broader agenda, they are going too far."

Story continues below

Attorney Frank Mylar said the registry is part of a national ruse by "homosexual groups like the Human Rights Campaign ... to get as many marriage lookalikes" as possible to start creating an equal protection argument.

The question of just what is allowed under the state's marriage policy was also a topic in 2004 before voters approved it in the ballot box. Back then, Monte Stewart, a supporter of the policy, had said that to be in violation a relationship would have to be sexually based and "walk, talk and act like a marriage."

Sen. Scott McCoy, D-Salt Lake, was at the time head of the campaign against Amendment 3 and had raised concerns that the marriage policy could prevent even basic benefits for same-sex couples.

On Monday, Will Carlson, spokesman for Equality Utah, said, "We were accused of being ridiculous for suggesting that hospital visitation could be prohibited under Amendment 3," which constitutionally banned same-sex marriage in Utah.

Stewart said that "based on what I know, this city ordinance does not violate" that, in large part because it's based on mutual dependence, not a sexual relationship.

However, Christensen said the city registry does potentially violate the policy because "it creates a whole new vocabulary" and recognition.

When questioned by McCoy as to whether a family pass at a city skating rink would violate Amendment 3, Christensen replied simply that SB267 wouldn't deny access to public facilities.

Recent comments

1. Gays have exactly the same rights as straights.
2. Less than...

2 quick clarifications | Feb. 16, 2008 at 3:09 p.m.

Anon,
And thank you for not going down that road of villification...

Voice of Reason | Feb. 15, 2008 at 4:09 p.m.

Hey maybe registering them is a good idea. Then we'd know where they...

Leon | Feb. 15, 2008 at 7:48 a.m.

Image
Keith Johnson, Deseret Morning News

Salt Lake Mayor Ralph Becker listens Monday to Sen. Chris Buttars, foreground, speak against Salt Lake City's domestic partner registry. Becker defended the registry.

previousnext

Latest comments

I am confident that Glen Beck has the read the book by Gary Allen,NONE DARE...

The best thing we could do would be to get rid of all the people in DC who...

He would not pull out a whip, that's for sure. You people must read a...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

i havent read anything about 20 mil. i read 32 to 36 mil not confirmed. 15...

Enter comment Introduzca comentario ¡¡Por Dios!! Esto no es cosa del...

When I was 16, I thought the world of my seminary teachers. They all talked...

Girls/Ladies/Women, let me first introduce reality into this discussion. In...

Obviously you don't get my point. They were non-violent resisters. They were...

PRESIDENT CLINTON was guilty of the SAME KIND OF CRIME. An older man in a...

Ah, The Religion of Peace! :-)

Advertisements