From Deseret News archives:

Privatization bills stall after questions arise

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2008 1:38 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A move to privatize some government activities stalled Tuesday, after one of three bills ran into a barrage of questions and clarification issues in a committee hearing.

Rep. Craig Frank, R-Pleasant Grove, wants to expand both the authority and size of the current privatization policy board to "review whether or not certain services performed by existing state agencies could be privatized to provide the same types and quality of services that would result in cost savings."

The bill would also require state agencies to create an inventory of all commercial activities the government is providing.

Frank's bill, HB75, would only apply to state agencies, not county or city operations. That's a change from just a week ago, when Frank wanted all levels of government to be subject to privatization boards.

Members of the House Government Operations standing committee raised questions on which agencies would be included, whether or not the public education system was exempt from the process and how the board seats were disbursed between the public and private industry.

Story continues below
The committee passed an amendment to include state transportation agencies, including the Utah Department of Transportation, despite testimony from UDOT representatives that they are already accounting for operations through an annual presentation to state appropriations committees.

Current language in the bill is not clear on the issue of exempting public schools and Frank was asked by the committee to do further work on HB75 and present it again at the next hearing.

Frank has another bill, HB76, would abolish the current government privatization policy board and force the state, cities and counties to create a commission to whom businesses could appeal the operations of publicly-funded projects that compete with them, including golf courses, reception halls and recreation centers.

If the commission finds that a public project is improperly competing with private business and the local government doesn't cease the project's operations, the commission could ask the district court for an injunction.

Like Frank, Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, wants to crack down on governments overstepping their responsibilities and offering services that should be provided by the private sector.

Stephenson has a bill that would require counties to create an inventory of all "competitive activities" that are not a core governmental activity.


E-mail: ldethman@desnews.com;araymond@desnews.com

Recent comments

Stephensen must own a golf course, swimming pool etc and doesn't want...

jr | Feb. 6, 2008 at 9:11 a.m.

BEWARE!!! The
gov. will tell you thyey can privatize and save...

Jake | Feb. 5, 2008 at 4:18 p.m.

Someone is looking out for the wealthy and not for his constituants....

Dreamer | Feb. 5, 2008 at 3:49 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Re: Anonymous @6:24 No - what do you mean??

Don't weaken booster seat law

Society has an obligation to protect little children from asinine adults who...

Preps of the week

matt stewart is the best player in the state

Lawmakers, educators debate plan

How many other professions would you bbe willing to pay based on years of...

The choice to the voters is to elect local reps. Who then vote on national...

Democrats unveil jobs package

Citizens and politicians share the blame. When we go the wrong way long...

How are they overrated? they are 20-0 can your school say that. Seems like a...

Editorial: Air standards changing

The day American engineering matches Japanese and German engineering will...

Obama: GOP, Dems can spur jobs

Citizens and politicians share the blame. When we go the wrong way long...

Pagan: If I wish to state an opinion, I will state it. There is no...

Advertisements