From Deseret News archives:

Infant products might not be so safe, study finds

Are powders and lotions carriers of chemicals?

Published: Monday, Feb. 4, 2008 12:05 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
CHICAGO — Baby shampoos, lotions and powders may expose infants to chemicals that have been linked with possible reproductive problems, a small study suggests.

The chemicals, called phthalates, are found in many ordinary products including cosmetics, toys, vinyl flooring and medical supplies. They are used to stabilize fragrances and make plastics flexible.

In the study, they were found in elevated levels in the urine of babies who'd been recently shampooed, powdered or lotioned with baby products.

Phthalates (pronounced thowl-ates) are under attack by some environmental advocacy groups, but experts are uncertain what dangers, if any, they might pose. The federal government doesn't limit their use, although California and some countries have restricted their use.

Animal studies have suggested that phthalates can cause reproductive birth defects and some activists believe they may cause reproductive problems in boys and early puberty in girls.

Rigorous scientific evidence in human studies is lacking. The current study offers no direct evidence that products the infants used contained phthalates, and no evidence that the chemicals in the babies' urine caused any harm. Still, the results worried environmental groups that support restrictions on these chemicals.

Story continues below
"There is an obvious need for laws that force the beauty industry to clean up its act," said Stacy Malkan of Health Care Without Harm.

The study's lead author, Dr. Sheela Sathyanarayana, a University of Washington pediatrician, said, "The bottom line is that these chemicals likely do exist in products that we're commonly using on our children and they potentially could cause health effects."

Babies don't usually need special lotions and powders, and water alone or shampoo in very small amounts is generally enough to clean infant hair, Sathyanarayana said.

Concerned parents can seek products labeled "phthalate-free," or check labels for common phthalates, including DEP and DEHP.

But the chemicals often don't appear on product labels. That's because retail products aren't required to list individual ingredients of fragrances, which are a common phthalate source.

The Food and Drug Administration "has no compelling evidence that phthalates pose a safety risk when used in cosmetics," spokeswoman Stephanie Kwisnek said. "Should new data emerge, we will inform the public as well as the industry."

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says the health effects in humans are uncertain.

Recent comments

Strange.... Verry strange....

weirded out | Feb. 4, 2008 at 6:13 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Its pretty lame that a article talking about the improvement in Utah State's...

If he didn't do anything wrong, he's very smart to hire a top-notch attorney....

This will definately increase the value of downtown SLC. Driving and parking...

"...I use my mute button. Why pass law?" Because you shouldn't be forced...

As with any peaks, there will be winners and losers...

Palin/ Beck in 2012! Sarah would be the best president ever! And Glenn...

GOP loving 'ma'am' exchange

When you arguments lack any real substance all you can do is appeal to...

This will have about as much success as the Federal Do Not Call List. Notice...

Does this mean that only companies in Utah that have worker comp of Utah and...

"I agree with KM, 4:47 p.m. I am truly scared for our country." The Fox News...

Advertisements