From Deseret News archives:

Auditors rake deficiencies in coal mining regulatory program

Published: Thursday, Jan. 17, 2008 12:23 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Legislative Auditor General's Office laid it on strong Wednesday: Utah's coal mining regulatory program lacks good management practices in several key areas, is inconsistent in enforcing rules and in issuing emergency permits, and has not performed as well as it reported to Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr.

The criticism during the meeting of the Natural Resources Appropriations Subcommittee fleshes out the report itself, which was made public in December.

The coal regulatory program, part of the Utah Division of Gas, Oil and Mining, is responsible for monitoring impacts of coal operations on the ground's surface, such as checking for water pollution. Its authority ends at the mine portal, where other agencies, such as the federal government's Mine Safety and Health Administration, take over.

"Management needs to institute more adequate policies and procedures," Auditor General supervisor Kade Minchey said.

According to the audit, coal operators are required to submit water-monitoring data every quarter, and the division should review the reports within 30 days of receipt. Minchey noted, "eighty-nine percent of water reports in 2006 were not reviewed on time." Some reports were more than a year old before they were reviewed, he said.

Story continues below
Coal operators seem to be submitting the information as required, but sometimes the state's program has not notified them of the review. The audit said some coal operators were frustrated about not receiving water information feedback.

A tool called the Governor's Balanced Scorecard is intended to allow agencies to measure their performance. The audit discovered that the Division of Oil, Gas and Mining had not been measuring some key performance indicators of the coal program.

In reporting to Huntsman last year, auditors found disparities between how the division said the coal program performed and how it really did. In the first quarter of 2007, the division said the coal program completed its work in a timely fashion 78 percent of the time. After adding features that the division had not included and correcting calculation errors, auditors said the real figure that quarter was that the work was completed on time 73 percent of the time.

In the second quarter of 2007, the division reported that the coal program's work was completed on time 88 percent of the time, when the actual figure was 65 percent. For the third quarter that year, the division claimed the coal program was 87 percent on time when really it was 50 percent, says the audit.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

As good as TCU is, I think Utah has a great chance. One thing I admire about...

South Summit loves stampeds so bring it on because it is going to be a long...

What showdown? This will be a TCU beat-down of the mighty #16 in the BCS...

Editorial: 'Immigrant' children needy

Health care should not depend on being lucky enough to be able to get decent...

7:56am. There are about 3 billion children in the world who need help. Are...

5A preview: Lone Peak at Hunter

Y IS THERE A PICTURE OF LP'S RECIEVER ON HERE WHEN THEY LOST.....LOL

Cougars' execution flawless

Funny how the level of "execution" goes up against teams with poor talent....

Cougars crush hapless Cowboys

All MWC football fans need to get behind TCU, it's the only way we can hope...

12 high schools ready for 'The Turf'

Several schools have turf now...so it is not the Turf. Playing in a...

Lambert surprisingly tops news

Two weeks ago BYU quit against TCU. When was the last time Utah quit when...

Advertisements
Advertisement