From Deseret News archives:

In calculating delegates, 2 plus 2 may equal 3 — or 5

Published: Thursday, Jan. 10, 2008 12:04 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Say you're a number cruncher. Say you're a detail person. Say you are devoting close attention to the U.S. presidential race and want up-to-the minute totals of who's ahead in the count of delegates and by how much.

Good luck. Political enthusiasts better get their own calculator and a scorecard — or two.

In the last week, we watched Barack Obama beat Hillary Clinton in Iowa, then she repaid the favor in New Hampshire. Mitt Romney took "silver" in Iowa behind Mike Huckabee and another second behind John McCain in New Hampshire. In between, he wowed 'em in Wyoming, taking eight of 12 available delegates during Republican county conventions.

So who's winning? Who has the most delegates? Shouldn't simple mathematics prevail?

Most total delegates won in Iowa + Wyoming + New Hampshire = Current delegate leader So you might think.

Instead, the current delegate count published on Wednesday by the Associated Press shows delegate totals of 19 for Romney, compared to 31 for Huckabee.

Meanwhile, CNN's online scorecard reports a nearly opposite tally: Romney, 30; Huckabee, 21.

Story continues below
Looking at totals for Democratic candidates is just as confounding. Clinton has one number on the CNN site and another number on the "scorecard" that's displayed on the Democratic National Committee's Web site. And AP reports yet another total altogether. Same for Obama, John Edwards and Bill Richardson.

"The delegate selection process is horribly complicated," said Matthew Burbank, chairman of the political science department at the University of Utah. "Even in a political parties class I wouldn't try to teach the details of this."

The delegate conundrum is much like the minutiae of the United States income tax system, he said. "It's far too detailed, and there's really no need to know it."

But shouldn't 2 + 2 = 4? Why all the variation among sources?

Even Burbank is surprised at the disparity — but not totally.

"It's an approximation is what it really is," Burbank says of all the tallies. It makes sense in terms of what the national parties are trying to do — essentially reward their friends and punish their enemies — but it's not terribly clear in terms of trying to track this process, he said.

Here's why.

The number of delegates isn't even necessarily fixed.

Each year, the national political party can reward or spank individual states by handing out more or fewer delegates. Are you a state that elected a a Republican governor? Another GOP delegate for you. Add another congressional seat for the Democrats? You earn another Democratic delegate.

Recent comments

This system stinks. Is this a system to just elect the rich? Buying...

Dan Campbell | Jan. 29, 2008 at 1:15 a.m.

40% of delegates can do whatever they want, the popular vote does not...

Ed in Baltimore, Maryland | Jan. 21, 2008 at 7:00 a.m.

I have read with interest all the comments on this article and others...

Jim in Nevada | Jan. 11, 2008 at 4:00 a.m.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU professor remembered

This Sunday, December 13th will be the 34th Anniversary of Capetown...

The other automatic BCS teams are afraid of facing and losing to a non-BCS...

U.N. climate conference opens

In truth... this is not a completely scientific debate. It's at least 50%...

I really don't understand why anyone would spend even a second (or even one...

A single's Christmas card

Don, Just have family and friends look at your picture on the blog and call...

One of the many untold stories from Vietnam is all the serviceman who shunned...

IN-N-OUT coming to Draper

Much ado about nothing

TCU is getting robbed outright by not getting a chance to play one of the...

'Friends' help addicts

Her first name is Ali, not Shelley. Good luck to you Ali!

Nice comment. I can admit I am not totally comfortable at all with resigning...

Advertisements