Cottonwood Heights is deciding on police force

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2008 12:58 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS — The City Council will decide at its public meeting tonight whether to create its own police department or to continue contracting with the Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office for law enforcement services.

The council has been mulling the decision since July 2007 when its top cop, Sheriff's Lt. Robbie Russo, was put on administrative leave for disciplinary reasons, said Mayor Kelvyn Cullimore Jr. The city played no role in the decision, and Russo was later reassigned to a different precinct.

City officials have also been concerned about a perceived failure on the part of the Sheriff's Office to fulfill its contractual duties to the city, Cullimore said. The problems started when the city incorporated in 2003 but increased when Salt Lake County Sheriff Jim Winder was elected, Cullimore said.

But Cullimore and the City Council have wanted control of their own department since its incorporation three years ago, according to Winder.

The creation of a CHPD — Cottonwood Heights Police Department — could mean the city's spending up to $3.1 million more for public safety services in exchange for more detectives, more patrol officers, a chance for federal grants and more local control.

Story continues below

It would also mean a loss of some services currently available through the Sheriff's Office such as specialized detectives, SWAT teams, canine units and the possibility of officers from nearby cities occasionally pitching in for non-emergency patrols.

The city plans to access services such as SWAT teams by joining inter-local agreements with cities such as Sandy and Draper, Cullimore said. Winder said Monday that plan may be seriously flawed.

Cooperation between city departments only exists in times of emergencies, agreed Sheriff's Lt. Paul Jaroscak. Shared services are unavailable for day-to-day calls, and surrounding municipalities don't have the resources or willingness to pitch in regularly.

Cottonwood Heights would be choosing to sacrifice public safety for a chance to control its own officers if it chooses to opt out of contracting with the Sheriff's Office, Winder said. For a small portion of its start-up costs and increased ongoing costs accrued in running its own force, the city could afford to pay the sheriff for several more deputies.

Cullimore said one of the most important functions of local government is public safety. That role is neutered anytime a city decides to contract its law enforcement services, he said. A police chief and department would be directly accountable to city government.

With its own department, Cottonwood Heights would have more control of its funds, more disciplinary control of its officers, more say over local programs such as ticketing and more say in which cases are most important, Cullimore said.

Recent comments

I think I'll make up a bumper sticker just for this event of the take...

Costoppo | Aug. 27, 2008 at 8:08 a.m.

I've live in Cottonwood Heights for 2 year and consider the city...

Radar Gun | Aug. 26, 2008 at 10:52 p.m.

A common statement was, �I just wanted to see if anyone would show...

Ditto | March 17, 2008 at 5:30 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hey Kent- First of all, the Stadium of Fire is NOT a BYU production. ...

Leave him where he is and make him work or pay to stay there.

And let's put the blame where it all belongs....on Hedo. If he hadn't...

Just when you think Utah could not possibly get any more ridiculous,...

To the 10:51 commentator, Did I say he should not be on the sex offender...

To CJ3: How many centers out there really are their teams toughest post...

LDS seminary principal is arrested in sexual abuse

(Justice, mercy, charity...continued from previous comment) My heart goes...

So the new disclosure rules reveal what those who understand politics have...

LDS seminary principal is arrested in sexual abuse

What Brother Pratt allegedly did was unequivocally wrong. The girl and her...

To the 10:51 commentator, There is no law defining pedophilia....

Advertisements