Provo Council votes to fund officers' retirement benefits

Published: Thursday, Dec. 27, 2007 12:07 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — Provo City Council — not Santa Claus — granted Provo police officer Austin Williams his Christmas wish this year. During a three-hour emergency meeting Wednesday, the council voted to take over the officer's retirement benefits, which will save the young officer and each of his colleagues around $400 a month (9 percent of their wage).

When Williams stepped out of cadet school and strapped his 9mm on for the first time to serve the public four months ago, he had no idea that Provo was one of just a handful of cities in Utah, and the only one in Utah County, that requires its police force to pay after-tax dollars back to the city for their retirement.

Hundreds of policemen, firemen and other city workers wiped Christmas from their eyes and showed up early Wednesday morning for an emotional debate in a jam-packed city council chambers about amending a 24-year-old parity law.

The ordinance was enacted to keep fire, police and other public employee groups from pushing for different compensations and benefits, relieving the council of lobbying pressure to favor one group over the other.

Every other city employee's retirement is covered, said council chairman George Stewart. "It's time we address the police concern."

Story continues below

City employees who are not firefighters or policeman retire after 30 years. Since firemen and police officers retire after 20, their monthly saving rate is higher, but firemen do not have to pay an out-of-pocket cost because the difference is covered by a state tax on homeowner insurance.

When the council was first given a chance to vote for a change in what was supposed to be their last meeting of the year Dec. 18, 40 well-prepared policemen crowded the chambers with a compelling presentation that had as its focal point recruitment.

Paying the officers' retirement will make the department more attractive to new recruits. The department has struggled in its attempt to hire eight more officers for a long time.

"It's the No. 1 issue in our department," said police chief Craig Geslison. "It's not the only (recruiting) issue — I wouldn't hang my hat on it — but it's the biggest."

Provo Mayor Lewis Billings, however, disagreed, calling the Provo police department already competitive. He said Provo's basic senior officer makes more than Orem and about 20 percent more than a Utah County officer.

"I want to caution the council from walking through that door," he said. "I would personally like an approach that will allow me more time."

He recommended that their retirement be paid for only on an "interim basis" in the next year while they study "a better solution."

The council unanimously decided to pay for the officers' retirement in the earlier meeting, but the emergency meeting had to be scheduled because of timing. The Legislature only allows cities to join the state's noncontributory system when a bill is sponsored about every four years. The council opted to decide before the end of that window and most of them said that no better option had been presented.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I would wear more than a face mask to go in there, full body bio hazard suit!

Demonrats and taxes are coming for you next.

I like Milsap a whole lot but we should let hime go. That is a lot of money...

I hate to lose Paul. He plays the game the way it should be played. Humble,...

Any tax on any one hurts us all.

Either way Portland dominates the Jazz with ease next year! Go Blazers!!!

A good guide for the average person, but for even the average fan, this stuff...

Obama controls all

re: Lee | 4:31 a.m. July 10, 2009 What exactly is the diferrence between...

Utah Jazz: Trail Blazers offer Millsap 4-year deal

I think this should be a restructuring year for the jazz. Let's use this year...

Thank you McKay for this much much needed article. I have been a member of...

Advertisements