From Deseret News archives:

Little gain on class sizes

Published: Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2007 12:14 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Utah has spent more than $700 million to make public schools' classes smaller, but that cash hasn't put much of a dent in what have become some of the country's biggest class sizes, Utah's Legislative Auditor General's Office found.

That's partly because the money isn't rising proportionately to enrollment, according to a performance audit of class-size reduction money, presented Tuesday to legislative leaders on the Audit Subcommittee of the Legislative Management Committee. That's even though the law says it should.

"Essentially, for the last six years, (class-size reduction) funds functioned as maintenance funding rather than providing for new class-size reduction efforts," auditors wrote.

Indeed, from 2000 to 2006, the number of teachers hired with class-size reduction money ultimately rose by just two people, or from 1,175 teachers to 1,177, auditors estimated.

The audit came after lawmakers last winter questioned districts' use of class-size reduction money.

Annual allotments have risen from $4.4 million in fiscal 1993 to $74.4 million in fiscal 2007.

The national average teacher-to-student ratio is 1 to 15.8; Utah's is 1 to 22.6 — among the nation's highest, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Patti Harrington said.

Story continues below
In talking to parents or teachers, "class-size reduction is the first thing that comes out of their mouths in terms of the first thing they want to see addressed at the Legislature," Utah PTA education commissioner Holly Langton said. "If we start chipping away at it ... we could be in a decent position several years from now" in terms of class size.

Class sizes typically are reduced by adding teachers or classroom space, the latter of which a couple districts have done within legal guidelines. Districts overwhelmingly use the money to hire new teachers, auditors said.

But the cost of those hires has gone way up. From fiscal years 2000 to 2006, both money for class-size reduction and average teacher compensation went up 25 percent, the audit states. Between 2001 and 2004, health insurance premiums went up between 11 and 14 percent. And in tight budget years of 2003 to 2005, the state's investment in class-size reduction only slightly increased.

Some years, the number of teachers in the program dropped, from 1,201 in 2002 to 1,177 last fiscal year.

Also stretching finances: All schools get class-size reduction money, even if they "do not appear to need to reduce class sizes," the audit noted. Charter schools, for instance, are getting around $4 million, even though they have enrollment caps.

Harrington hopes the audit directs lawmakers' attention to program needs.

Recent comments

From where I come from (Australia). In a state with 5 miliion they...

Bocas Brain | Dec. 19, 2007 at 3:38 p.m.

I don't see what all the complaining is about, wasn't one size fits...

Still no choice | Dec. 19, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

Every so often the powers that be manipulate an economic situation...

Anonymous | Dec. 19, 2007 at 2:56 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements