Judging the judges

Published: Monday, Nov. 26, 2007 12:46 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A task force assigned to find new and better ways to help Utah voters evaluate judges ended five months of work last week without any firm recommendations. This shows how truly difficult the task is.

An independent judiciary is an essential ingredient for any free society, but that independence cannot come without accountability. Accountability, however, is no easy task.

Some states make judges run for election, which presents a host of problems, not the least of which is that judges may be tempted to make popular, but incorrect, decisions with an eye toward the next election. Utah has wisely avoided this course.

It is equally troubling to have state lawmakers too closely involved in meddling with the judiciary, endangering the separation that ought to exist between the legislative and judicial branches of government. In the past, some Utah lawmakers have proposed making judges stand for a new Senate confirmation vote every few years, which would greatly compromise judicial independence.

At present, Utah requires judges to stand for retention elections every few years. Voters are asked whether each judge ought to be retained. Other than a few judges who have been the subject of intense negative campaigns, this has resulted in virtually every judge being retained. That has led to discussions about how to provide voters more relevant information that might help them make informed decisions.

Story continues below

The task force discussed systems that would assign grades to the judges. Currently, voters are given results of surveys conducted among attorneys and others who deal with the judges. But the task force reached no conclusions, other than that lawmakers should create a new commission to do the evaluating. But nothing is expected for the upcoming legislative session.

We would suggest that the judiciary make its disciplinary process against judges more open and subject to scrutiny, even though most cases end with little or no discipline.

The bottom line is that there is no perfect system for appointing and retaining judges. However, both Utah voters and the Judicial Conduct Commission have proven themselves capable of removing judges through the years. Certainly, lawmakers, judges and others should continue to study ways to help voters make more informed decisions. For the most part, however, the current system seems to be working well.

Recent comments

I often disagree with Anonymous, but not this time.

Janey | Nov. 26, 2007 at 7:24 p.m.

The Founders of this nation considered judicial independence to be...

Anonymous | Nov. 26, 2007 at 2:48 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Utah Jazz: Trail Blazers offer Millsap 4-year deal

wisdom. Call Prichard's bluff and let Millsap go. It is too much money and he...

My bad I forgot Thomas.

Tough decision in my eyes. Yes it is a lot of money to pay for Milsap to sit...

The definition of "lie" is to make an untrue statement with the intent to...

why do people complain about the story vs. not story. If you don't think the...

Know your enemy: relax no one cares about the spelling. Anonymous: I agree...

I'm sure glad he saved us! No if we could just get those sea levels down...

I am supposing they were trying to get on the news, and in the newspapers....

What a great Idea, 12 years of hard labor vs. siting on your butt for 12...

There has been no evidence of a possible global collapse. The only evidence...

Advertisements