Private lands a sore point in many parks

Published: Thursday, Nov. 22, 2007 12:09 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
HELENA, Mont. — The managers of Utah's Zion National Park missed an opportunity when 10 spectacular acres of privately owned land within the park's boundaries came onto the market.

The managers wanted Zion to buy up the property and protect it from further development because of its world-class view of the park's awesome, 3,800-foot red rock cliffs. But the park didn't have the money.

A California couple eventually purchased the land, expanded an old tavern on the site and use it for spiritual retreats.

"Now there's a large structure with lights that people would see as they drive the road," said Zion Superintendent Jock Whitworth.

Within the 84-million-acre national park system are some 5.4 million acres of private parcels, an area nearly as big as New Hampshire. They include wetlands popular for birdwatching at Acadia National Park in Maine, the site of a Civil War hospital at Gettysburg National Military Park in Pennsylvania and Indian cultural sites at Big Bend National Park in Texas.

Many of these parcels have been held for generations by people who owned the land before Congress created the parks.

The Park Service has identified about a third of the private land for acquisition. But in fiscal year 2007, the agency was allocated $24.6 million for buying the property. That is little more than 1 percent of the $2 billion or so the Park Service says would be needed to purchase all the land it wants.

Story continues below

"We ought to be finishing what we started, and we're not doing it," said Paul Pritchard, founder of the National Park Trust, a private organization.

The National Park Service has on its wish list 11,613 tracts encompassing 1.8 million acres. The $24.6 million allocated is down from a 10-year high of nearly $139 million in 1999.

National Park Service spokesman Jeff Olson said the Bush administration has focused more on managing the land it already controls than on acquiring more.

"The dollars have steadily fallen off because we are in deficit, because we are funding a two-front war, because there are a host of other spending priorities that compete," said Alan Front, vice president for the Trust for Public Land.

But he warned that unless the Park Service acquires the private land within the parks' boundaries, "there is a real and pressing threat that inappropriate development will mar the landscape that people are flocking to for respite and retreat."

Chuck Cushman of the American Land Rights Association, formed in 1978 to represent owners of property within parks, said it is just as well the Park Service is short of money.

Inholders, as the property owners inside the parks are known, "live in fear that a change in administration, a new Congress — all of a sudden they're going to have land acquisition agents at their door, trying to force them out," Cushman said.

Recent comments

"’We think development of that land is inappropriate,’...

samhill | Nov. 22, 2007 at 9:31 a.m.

Image
Hank Landau, Associated Press

A retreat owned by The Center for True North sits on private land inside Zion National Park.

previousnext

Latest comments

Tough decision in my eyes. Yes it is a lot of money to pay for Milsap to sit...

The definition of "lie" is to make an untrue statement with the intent to...

why do people complain about the story vs. not story. If you don't think the...

Know your enemy: relax no one cares about the spelling. Anonymous: I agree...

I'm sure glad he saved us! No if we could just get those sea levels down...

I am supposing they were trying to get on the news, and in the newspapers....

What a great Idea, 12 years of hard labor vs. siting on your butt for 12...

There has been no evidence of a possible global collapse. The only evidence...

I just went to the Mormon myth busting site (great name, BTW!) but it needs a...

Jazz need to keep Milsap without a doubt! he did a lot for us. Trade AK and...

Advertisements