Salt Lake's public safety bond gains 28 votes — but not enough

Published: Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2007 12:08 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
It's official: The price tag was too high and property-tax increase too steep for Salt Lake City residents to support Proposition 1.

The $192 million proposed public safety bond was defeated by 263 votes — 21,269 to 21,006, according to results of an official canvass announced Tuesday. The 2,416 valid provisional and absentee ballots made an already close vote closer — by 28 votes — but didn't change the outcome.

Salt Lake City Police Chief Chris Burbank called the outcome "unfortunate" but said he wasn't crossing his fingers in hopes of the Election Day results being reversed.

"It really doesn't change the direction we began proceeding down immediately after the election," Burbank said.

The police chief said he has been working with the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor-elect Ralph Becker on how to address the city's need for public safety facilities.

"At the end of the day, the need still exists," Burbank said.

The bond would have paved the way for five new public safety structures at three locations. About $100 million of the bond was slated to go toward a new public safety building to replace the nearly 50-year-old building, 315 E. 200 South, which public safety officials have called "dilapidated" and even "unsafe."

Story continues below

But the hefty price tag — and its accompanying property-tax increase of $175 per year on a $300,000 home — made the bond a tough sell. The proposal also had several high-profile opponents, including Mayor Rocky Anderson, Salt Lake County Council members Joe Hatch, Randy Horiuchi and Jim Bradley and the Utah Taxpayers Association.

Plans for the bond called for a new public safety building, an emergency operations center and a combined parking/evidence storage structure to be grouped as a downtown public safety campus.

That campus remains the No. 1 need for the public safety in the city, Burbank said. Discussions with members of the City Council and Becker have included talks about whether to focus on building that structure before addressing needs for the other facilities.

The bond also would have paid for a new west-side fire station and training center in Glendale and a combined east-side police/fire public safety facility in Sugar House.

Members of the Salt Lake City Council say the city's public safety facilities still need to be addressed — likely with a revised bond proposal. That proposal, they said, needs to come from Anderson or Becker when he takes office in January.

"We need to have the administration come back and tell us what options we have," Councilman Carlton Christensen said. "We need to do something. It's a dilemma for us, and we need to resolve it."

Recent comments

It is forever amazing how residents in Utah, and especially SLC, will...

Former Resident | Nov. 21, 2007 at 12:48 p.m.

Two things have caught my eye in the news recently. The...

Dutchman | Nov. 21, 2007 at 11:57 a.m.

Even though my property taxes were already raised by about $100 I...

Lynne | Nov. 21, 2007 at 8:54 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Didn't Obama and Biden just admit to the fact that the stimilus programs were...

The last part of the article about Cowherd is classic!!! I normally like the...

This man was my teacher in high school. He is my friend, he was like a father...

I like millsap, but portland just burried themselves. They made themselves...

It's amazing how quickly society is willing to vaccinate it's children with...

The first income tax was introduced during the Civil War, that's only 70...

If he really did what the evidence seems to show, I don't think he should be...

Utah needs Portland too much. It's much harder than you think to find good...

Restaurant destroyed by fire

stacy, have you ever eaten there ??

I had Brother Pratt at Viewmont High School my sophomore year... I was really...

Advertisements