From Deseret News archives:

Are small districts better?

Published: Monday, Nov. 5, 2007 12:14 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
But the ultimate perk in a split is a more manageable sized district, with greater and more focused community representation that can only translate into good things for kids, supporters say.

Research shows smaller is better in terms of class size — 15 to 19 kids being optimal — and schools, with an optimum put at 200- to 400- student elementaries and 400 to 900 student middle- and high-schools, according to a study by the Utah Education Policy Center, conducted for Holladay and South Salt Lake cities and Salt Lake County as they examined breaking away from Granite School District.

Split supporters note smaller schools and classes are products of smaller school districts.

That is certainly the case among rural Utah School Districts, according to State Office of Education 2006 fiscal year staffing ratios. Jordan District had the states' largest class sizes with an average 26.67 students per teacher, state numbers show. By comparison, the 23,000-student Salt Lake District had 22 students per teacher.

Then again, the 6,300-student Murray District has 23 students per teacher, the same as Granite District, which is more than 10 times bigger than Murray.

Story continues below
Research, however, doesn't pinpoint an optimal size school district, the education policy center reported. Andrea Rorrer, center director and U. assistant professor in educational leadership and policy, notes smaller school districts won't necessarily guarantee smaller schools and class sizes.

But Cullimore argues a smaller district would offer the freedom to create smaller class sizes, because of fewer students per school and stable to slightly declining enrollments.

There's also a chance a new district could benefit from economies of scale, supporters say. A former Colorado school funding method gave more money to very small districts and those over 25,500 students, where legislative researchers there found economies of scale began to erode.

"It really boils down to some basic concepts of having an 80,000-student school district that is bureaucratic and difficult to work with vs. a district that would have half as many students," Cullimore said. "The reasons we are doing this is to create an opportunity to change."

"It's much easier to make changes with a small group than it is with a large group," said West Jordan Mayor David Newton, who favors forming a school district just for his own west-side city.

But a West Jordan succession could be risky, said City Councilwoman Melissa Johnson. As she sees it, that proposal is hinged on the belief the east side will break away. But what if the east-side vote fails?

Recent comments

Then why had the Jordan School District when asked for an audit in I...

Anonymous | Nov. 6, 2007 at 12:55 p.m.

Jordan District has a national reputation for being fiscally...

National Financial Reputation | Nov. 6, 2007 at 9:46 a.m.

Yes they (the admins) do work hard for their money especially when...

Anonymous | Nov. 6, 2007 at 9:08 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements